Gos:
I agree that one can make an argument about how "HIV experts" are acting like Nazis, but my point was that comparing "dissidents" to "Holocaust deniers" is absurd. In fact, to be precise (as is necessary in science and logical argument construction) one should specify examples, rather than "lump" all critics together under the "dissident" rubric.
There's another interesting point that is worth making on this thread, and it involves refutation experiments. This is a crucial part of science, but one that is simply not allowed in "HIV/AIDS" land. Instead, these people tell us that "it's all been settled," or something along those lines, which is an anti-scientific statement. Here's an interesting question to ask such people: "why have scientists who wanted to test Einstein's relativity gotten funding to do so, yet those who want to question 'HIV/AIDS' are lucky not to get funding revoked, for whatever they happen to be currently working on?" There's simply no good answer that is consistent with science. This situation makes it appear that Einstein's relativity is a rather weak hypothesis but that "HIV/AIDS" is "rock solid," though nothing could be further from the truth, of course, if one actually examines the evidence. |
Free Forum Hosting
Important Announcement
Prev Message
