MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
Nutrition : What causes hypertension?
Choose another message board
View All Messages
  Prev Message  Next Message       
Reply
 Message 1 of 4 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrect  (Original Message)Sent: 4/13/2007 5:39 AM
Many have asked me this, and I point out that "salt" is not to blame, but rather a diet rich in chloride (contained in salt), and low in potsassium (in many cases).  My guess is that having arachidonic acid in one's cells makes the situation much worse, leading to many cases of hypertension that would not occur if the Mead acid was in one's cells, even if the diet was chloride rich and potassium poor.  For example:
 
QUOTE:  Nitric oxide (NO), a multifunctional effector molecule that plays a central role in the maintenance of vascular homeostasis, regulates vascular tone and inhibits platelet and leukocyte adhesion to endothelial cells. NO status is related to the endothelial function. Patients with hypertension have lower levels of NO, increased free radical production, higher oxidative stress, augmented platelet aggregation, and a change in the arachidonic acid cascade metabolism, all leading to the acceleration of the atherosclerotic process. The study subjects included a group of 21 normotensive healthy subjects (8 males and 13 females) with a mean age of 39.2 +/- 1.8 years and a body mass index of 27.9 kg/m, and another group of 42 patients (19 males and 23 females) with untreated essential hypertension with a mean age of 47.6 +/- 1.7 years and a body mass index of 28.3 kg/m. Serum levels and urinary excretion of NO determined as combined nitrate/nitrite (NOx) and serum malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations were measured in the 2 groups of subjects. The serum levels and 24-hour urinary excretion of NOx were significantly higher and the renal clearance of NO was lower in the normotensive group than in the hypertensive patients, indicating decreased NO status in hypertension. There was a negative correlation between serum NO levels and mean arterial pressure, suggesting that a decrease in NO availability is related to increase in blood pressure. Serum concentrations of MDA were higher in the hypertensive patients as compared with the normotensive individuals, suggesting increased oxidative stress in hypertensive patients. These results are in agreement with previous studies showing decreased NO and increased oxidative stress in hypertension. In conclusion, patients with essential hypertension as compared with normotensive individuals have lower NO status, which may contribute to the endothelial dysfunction in hypertension. Increased serum malondialdehyde in hypertensives suggests an association between increased oxidative stress with higher blood pressure.  UNQUOTE.
 
Source:   Am J Ther. 2007 Mar-Apr;14(2):172-6.
 


Replies to This Message The number of members that recommended this message.    
     re: What causes hypertension?   MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrect  4/16/2007 9:34 PM