MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
The Scientific Debate Forum.Contains "mature" content, but not necessarily adult.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Disclaimer: Read this page first.  
  Links  
  Messages  
  General  
  Nutrition  
  "Mission Statement."  
  Why the "germ theory" is not science.  
  The Underlying Cause of "Disease."  
  The Scientific Method.  
  How dangerous are bacteria and viruses?  
  The Contributions of Hans Selye and others.  
  How direct effects are often ignored, and indirect markers used  
  Understanding "disease" at the molecular level.  
  Understanding disease at the molecular level, part II.  
  What the "common cold" can teach us about illness.  
  The AA connection to today's common "diseases."  
  How easy the key experiments would be to do.  
  The best practical diet and the explanation for it.  
  Fish oil quotes you might want to read  
  Where the "immune system" fits into this view of "disease."  
  How many 'scientific studies' violate the scientific method  
  Why you have to be careful with antioxidants.  
  Why Cancers today are more aggressive than those of the past.  
  The Latest Evidence.  
  Some studies worthy of note.  
  HSWC "in action."  
  How language can impede science.  
  How language impedes science, part II.  
  More on why "germs" don't cause "disease."  
  How a latent virus actually causes "disease."  
  A new report that "says it all."  
  The science "show" must go on?  
  Odds and ends  
  Some thoughts on a book by Robert Gallo.  
  Saturated fatty acids are the solution, not the problem.  
  It's stress, not "germs" that causes disease.  
  Epidemiology: Facts versus "factoids."  
  It's stress, not germs, part II.  
  The latest on "inflammation."  
  Why many nutritional claims make no sense  
  The use of hypotheticals in science.  
  What "viral infections" really do to the body.  
  What determines longevity?  
  An example of an anti-"saturated fat" study that is flawed.  
  A Rough Guide to a Gentle Diet.  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV."  
  A unified "AIDS" hypothsis without "HIV." Part II.  
  Okay, so when is this diet going to kill me?  
  Scientific Debate Forum Pictures  
  The EFA Claim Was Refuted Long Ago  
    
  
  
  Tools  
 
Nutrition : The latest evidence against cooked meat.
Choose another message board
View All Messages
  Prev Message  Next Message       
Reply
 Message 13 of 17 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrect  in response to Message 12Sent: 1/17/2008 9:45 PM
This was posted by someone else on another newsgroup:

"Turkey meat and water"
"Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels nearly quintupled"

Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology
New discovery could reduce the health risk of high-fat foods

January 14th, 2008

Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology

(NewsRx.com) -- Just as additives help gasoline burn cleaner, a
research report published in the January 2008 print issue of The FASEB
Journal shows that the food industry could take a similar approach
toward reducing health risks associated with fatty foods. These "meal
additives" would be based on work of Israeli researchers who
discovered that consuming polyphenols (natural compounds in red wine,
fruits, and vegetables) simultaneously with high-fat foods may reduce
health risks associated with these foods.
"We suggest a new hypothesis to explain polyphenols," said Joseph
Kanner, senior author of the report. "For the first time, these
compounds were demonstrated to prevent significantly the appearance of
toxic food derivative compounds in human plasma."

For the study, six men and four women were fed three different meals
consisting of dark meat turkey cutlets. One meal, the control,
consisted of turkey meat and water. The second meal consisted of
turkey meat with polyphenols added after cooking (one tablespoon of
concentrated wine) followed with a glass of red wine (about 7 ounces).
The third meal consisted of turkey meat with polyphenols added before
cooking and then followed by a glass of wine.

At various points during the study, researchers took blood and urine
samples to measure levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), a natural
byproduct of fat digestion known to increase the risk for heart
disease and other chronic conditions. The researchers found that MDA
levels nearly quintupled after the control meal, while MDA was nearly
eliminated after subjects consumed the meals with polyphenols.

"As long as deep fried candy bars are on menus, scientists will need
to keep serving up new ways to prevent the cellular damage caused by
these very tasty treats," said Gerald Weissmann, MD, Editor-in-Chief
of The FASEB Journal. "This study suggests that the time will come
where people can eat french fries without plugging their arteries."

Keywords: Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

This article was prepared by NewsRx editors from staff and other
reports. Copyright 2008, NewsRx.com.


Replies to This Message The number of members that recommended this message.    
     re: The latest evidence against cooked meat.   MSN NicknameHansSelyeWasCorrect  2/17/2008 10:32 PM