 |
|
Reply
| | From:  T-Girluk1 (Original Message) | Sent: 7/19/2007 11:21 AM |
Evolution vs. Creation is the Great Debate of our scientific times. In any scientific debate, the theories must be tested according to the evidence. We propose that the burden of evidence should be upon the Evolutionists, since Creation has been the historic and inherent default throughout virtually all cultures and religions until roughly the last 200 years.
Of course, Evolutionists, who view themselves as the only "scientists" in the debate, insist that the burden of evidence be upon the Creationists. Evolutionists reason, we cannot see the Creator, we cannot hear the Creator, and we cannot touch, taste or smell the Creator. Therefore, we are unable to test for the Creator with any form of scientific equipment developed thus far. Creationists retort, we cannot see, hear, touch, taste, or smell the human mind. We cannot test for the human mind with any form of scientific equipment developed thus far. When we run an electroencephalogram, we are measuring salt flow and electrical activity within the human brain. We cannot so much as even locate the human mind. Yet we watch as human carcasses run about, making order of disorder, conscious decisions according to subconscious criteria. We see the design and complexity that result from the operation of the brain through the invisible realm known as the mind. Thus, we know with certainty that the human mind exists. Therefore, it's absolutely logical for Creationists to postulate the existence of a Creator based upon the same "evidence." The design we see all around us came from one, grand concept, and such a concept can only come from a complex Mind. Furthermore, the mathematical and physical laws inherent in all things (including, most dramatically, the Laws of Thermodynamics and the Law of Cause and Effect) effectively validate this claim. What do you think ? |
|
 First
Previous
2-6 of 6
Next
Last
|
|
Reply
| |
hi teresa, l am sure spirit giving these thoughts, l have been asking questions on quantum theory. It is similar to the we cannot always measure things in a scientific way, so is it not real?, we all know there is electric, we know if we can see the light, only if we switch it on, but the electric is there.. we know how we can make electric, but what makes the light. l maybe off track here, but this what it seems to me. We have a mind, which l do believe is so complexed, maybe we see collectively through the invisible mind, thus knowing this, we can accept this as a known fact.. its bit like the big bang theory who made the earth, which came first the chicken or the egg. very interesting debate and topic.. ty teresa xxx l am going to give more thoughts, xx be back on this, how wonderful our thoughts is given, we really do learn to expand the mind, to learn and grow... love skydancing xxx hugs xxx "I completely agree with Michael Roll's arguments about the reality of paranormal phenomena and the existence of a normally unseen world... Quantum Physics: the presence of a wave nature in subatomic particles. The vital difference between a wave and a solid particle is the wave properties of superposition and modulation. Put simply, these properties allow waves of different frequencies to occupy the same space without direct interaction. Therefore it is quite possible for parallel universes to exist separated by a difference in some fundamental wave characteristic. This theory springs directly from wave mechanics which unfortunately was not available to the Victorian researchers when the greatest breakthroughs with mediumship were made."
Michael Scott BSc. Graduate in Astrophysics, Edinburgh University |
|
Reply
| |
Hi I think i should of mentioned i found that article on the web by accident looking for something else. There are many interesting articles there i think you may find of interest. Please feel free to post anything on this board you find of interest. |
|
Reply
| |
I see there are two races involved here , Human kind and Man kind. Man kind being the original evolution and Human kind being the creation. The DNA we are told is a not by chance program. In this universe there are so many kinds of life that can't mix together but those can all live together as Human kind. I know by visiting my late Wife the day after she died that she had returned to her original body.That was in Paradise where the Tree of life stands.( AA Michael's domain ). Peace and Light.............Les |
|
Reply
| |
hi les, I do understand what you are relating to us. It is interesting the tree of life. l have heard this before, here is a brief, thought on the tree of life. From what l see to evolution vs creation, is the chicken and the egg, which came first ( just a thought). Love your insight hugs skydancing xxx The philosophy behind this grew from an early interest in family tree, the main reason why I had gone to China. As a progression of this, The Tree of Life in its symbolic forms and cultural history, came to provide me with a symbol that transcends all cultural difference, while explaining the importance of indigenous cultures.
ooIn Norse mythology, Odin created the first man from the ash tree (woman was created from the mountain ash). A sacred tree, the ash was believed by Christians to be the only tree in the Garden of Eden unapproachable by the serpent. In Africa, the Iroko tree permeates culture in the shape of masks, sculpture and drums, giving spiritual strength to its community. The tree trunk or sacred pole was fundamental to North American Indian rituals, performed to strengthen relations with the sacred world. Buddha achieved enlightenment meditating beneath a banyan tree.
ooHaunting medieval Jewish mysticism such as the Kabbalah, the Inverted Tree conveyed the relationship between the invisible, transcendent God and the visible world of Creation. In Egypt, the Tree of Life was the sycamore tree from which the dead received eternal life. In Mohammed’s Night Journey, the Prophet discovers a tree of rubies, sapphires and emeralds, the miraculous Tuba Tree, which stood at the centre of Islamic Paradise. (R. Cook �The Tree of Life) �FONT face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The imagination is a tree. It has the integrative virtues of a tree. It is root and boughs. It lives between earth and sky. It lives in the earth and in the wind. The imagined tree imperceptibly becomes the cosmological tree, the tree which epitomises a universe.�French Philosopher �Gaston Bachelard |
|
Reply
| |
The Tree of Life is called so because at a casual glance at a distance it looks like an Oak tree in full leaf. But close to it's a very large sphere , about sixty feet in dia , like dark green glass mounted on a brown marble colmn. It stands in a area of yellow grass before the grey buildings. The two races lived side by side in the begining. Peace and Light Les |
|
|
First
Previous
2-6 of 6
Next
Last
|
|
Free Forum Hosting
Important Announcement
Return to ♥Teresa; Insight