MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
ALL MY TUDORS...history chat[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  ♦Greetings!  
  ♦Bits & Pieces  
  ♦Death & Burial  
  ♦Brasses & Monuments  
  Read this BEFORE you apply for membership!  
  ♦Group Guidelines  
  ♦To the Boards  
  ♦Message Board  
  
  General  
  
  The Dark Ages  
  
  The Normans  
  
  The Plantagenets  
  
  The Tudors  
  
  The Stuarts  
  
  Mysteries  
  
  Book Talk  
  
  Tudor Topics  
  
  Crusades  
  
  RBOR  
  
  WOTR  
  
  Right Royal Xmas  
  
  Royal Holidays  
  
  Misc Pages  
  ♦AMT Member Map  
  ♦AMT Member List  
  ♦This Week in History  
  ♦Castle of the Day  
  ♦AMT Goes to the Movies  
  ♦Lovely Links  
  ♦Brilliant Books  
  ♦Royal Begats  
  ♦The Royal Book of Records  
  ♦The Crusades  
  ♦The Wars of the Roses  
  ♦Six Wives  
  ♦Off With Her Head  
  ♦The Reformation in England  
  ♦The Tudors and the Tower  
  ♫Tudor Music  
  ♦Tudor Limericks  
  ♦Elizabethan Insults  
  ♦Elizabethan Dressing  
  ♦Elizabethan Makeup  
  ♦The Invincible Armada  
  ♦The Great Fire of London  
    
  Pictures  
  Manager Tools  
  
  
  Tools  
 
Book Talk : A Bloody Field by Shrewsbury
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 2 in Discussion 
From: Greensleeves  (Original Message)Sent: 9/14/2007 6:15 AM
I've had this in my stack of book sale finds forever.  The © date is 1972 & the author of A Bloody Field by Shrewsbury is Edith Parteger aka Ellis Peters who writes the Brother Cadfael mysteries (methinks there is a BBC show on them or there used to be).  The focus of the novel is on three Henrys....Henry "Hotspur" Percy, Henry IV aka Bolingbroke, & Henry V aka Prince Hal, & it starts with the deposition of Richard II & ends after Hotspur's death in battle with the House of Lancaster, which he created & then attempted to topple. 
 
I enjoyed reading this very much & did not want it to end the way it did  but I reckon you cannot change history.  The characters are quite believable & what I liked was that the author did not make a villain of the piece out of any of them, but attributed honor & valor to them all.  The prince was an especially sympathetic character, torn between his loyalty to his father & to Hotspur, in whose charge he was for a time in the Welsh Marches.  Henry IV was given the usual paranoia one would expect from a usurper, which colored his thinking & changed everything around him.  Hotspur is portrayed as the winner of Diogenes' search, a truly honest man wanting the good of the realm & trying to reconcile that with what he has done to upset the natural order of things & how it's adversely affected his family.
 
Near the end when Henry IV was mopping up after the battle & charging the ringleaders of the rebellion who survived the conflict, Hotspur's uncle pipes up & says well, look to your good self for your charge of treason mister, as you just did the exact same thing to Richard as we tried to do to you, & the only difference is, you succeeded.  He also pointed out to Henry that at least Hotspur had the guts to face him in open conduct, & not do to him what he had done to Richard (allegedly starving him to death at Pontefract after promising him his life). 


First  Previous  2 of 2  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 2 in Discussion 
From: GreensleevesSent: 9/14/2007 6:20 AM
Ooops I typo'd the author's name....that's PARGETER not Parteger