MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
ALL MY TUDORS...history chat[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  ♦Greetings!  
  ♦Bits & Pieces  
  ♦Death & Burial  
  ♦Brasses & Monuments  
  Read this BEFORE you apply for membership!  
  ♦Group Guidelines  
  ♦To the Boards  
  ♦Message Board  
  
  General  
  
  The Dark Ages  
  
  The Normans  
  
  The Plantagenets  
  
  The Tudors  
  
  The Stuarts  
  
  Mysteries  
  
  Book Talk  
  
  Tudor Topics  
  
  Crusades  
  
  RBOR  
  
  WOTR  
  
  Right Royal Xmas  
  
  Royal Holidays  
  
  Misc Pages  
  ♦AMT Member Map  
  ♦AMT Member List  
  ♦This Week in History  
  ♦Castle of the Day  
  ♦AMT Goes to the Movies  
  ♦Lovely Links  
  ♦Brilliant Books  
  ♦Royal Begats  
  ♦The Royal Book of Records  
  ♦The Crusades  
  ♦The Wars of the Roses  
  ♦Six Wives  
  ♦Off With Her Head  
  ♦The Reformation in England  
  ♦The Tudors and the Tower  
  ♫Tudor Music  
  ♦Tudor Limericks  
  ♦Elizabethan Insults  
  ♦Elizabethan Dressing  
  ♦Elizabethan Makeup  
  ♦The Invincible Armada  
  ♦The Great Fire of London  
    
  Pictures  
  Manager Tools  
  
  
  Tools  
 
Mysteries : Accidental Death...or Revenge???
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 4 in Discussion 
From: ForeverAmber  (Original Message)Sent: 10/7/2002 10:11 PM
Just before William the Conqueror exploded, he decided that William Rufus, rather than his older brother, Robert Curthose, Duke of Normandy, should be king of England. In 1088 a group of Normans, including Richard de Clare, rebelled against the rule of Rufus in order to place Robert on the throne. After a two day siege at Tonbridge Castle, Richard de Clare was forced to surrender to William. Richard was punished by having his castle and the town of Tonbridge burnt to the ground. Richard de Clare was also forced to live in a monastery where he died three years later. On 2nd August 1100, William Rufus went hunting at Brockenhurst in the New Forest. During the hunt, Walter Tirel fired an arrow at a stag. The arrow missed the animal and hit William Rufus in the chest. Within a few minutes the king was dead. Walter Tirel was Richard de Clare's son-in-law. Had the Clare family gained revenge on William Rufus?  Or was Henry I's finger in this pie somewhere?


First  Previous  2-4 of 4  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 4 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameLadyoftheGlade1Sent: 10/7/2002 11:55 PM
Interesting.......
 
But whether family revenge or the "finger" of Henry I....
 
It was certainly NOT an accident!

Reply
 Message 3 of 4 in Discussion 
From: GreensleevesSent: 6/29/2004 9:41 PM
What I find intriguing is that William Rufus was the SECOND son of William the Conqueror to meet his maker in this way!  WC's oldest son Richard ALSO got an arrow while hunting in the New Forest.  How much of coincedence is that, for 2 sons of the same family to die in the exact same fashion?  Was there something going on in terms of eradicting WC's heirs entirely, or was Richard's demise an accident that gave someone else an idea???

Reply
 Message 4 of 4 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameLadyoftheGlade1Sent: 7/6/2004 7:00 PM
Robert Curthose was a "mess".  He was no leader, no administrator, no finacial wizard, no nothing to redeem himself what so ever for such a position as King of England.  William I  knew this.  He devised the notion that as eldest son, Robert should inheirit William's original lands (which he did).  And as second son, William Rufus should inheirit William's "secondary"/newly aquired lands. 
 
However, Rufus seemed to neglect the first and most important responsibility of any monarch...begetting an heir!  He absolutely refused to marry (for what ever reason ). 

First  Previous  2-4 of 4  Next  Last 
Return to Mysteries