I must say that I agree with Jenny Wormauld.  Even if Mary didn't have any involvement in Darnley's murder, the evidence is rather incriminating.  I also agree that she really wanted to be Queen of England and she didn't seem to have much time for Scotland. I think that I'm fairly unbiased with my very Scottish ancestry! 

 

Also it's madness to bring this up at a time of great economic crisis!

It's just a Scottish Nationalist trying to make a name for herself. Westminster Abbey is a Royal Peculiar in that it comes under the direct control of the monarch, not a Bishop. Therefore any decision will have to be made by the Queen herself and I doubt if she'll disturb her ancestor's bones.

 

Katherine of Aragon still lies in Peterborough Cathedral. Her tomb was destroyed by the Puritans in 1642, but the site is marked.

It took James nine years to get round to it, so perhaps Mary would have done had she lived longer.

 

 

There's a huge vault in the ruins of Holyrood Abbey where about two dozen or so Stuarts are buried. Their tombs were desecrated centuries ago and the jumble of bones were put together in the one vault. I've read that very little of Lord Darnley was left after his tomb was wrecked, but what little there was is at Holyrood. 

Keep her at Westminister, I'm sure she'd rather be in England that Scotland, the  country she wasn't too fond of after the courts of France. As well, the Scots weren't too happy with her either, why should they want her back now?

 

Ref # 9. One of the first Acts of Mary I's first Parliament in October 1553 was to pass an Act legitimizing Mary by declaring her parents' marriage lawful.