MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
ALL MY TUDORS...history chat[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  ♦Greetings!  
  ♦Bits & Pieces  
  ♦Death & Burial  
  ♦Brasses & Monuments  
  Read this BEFORE you apply for membership!  
  ♦Group Guidelines  
  ♦To the Boards  
  ♦Message Board  
  
  General  
  
  The Dark Ages  
  
  The Normans  
  
  The Plantagenets  
  
  The Tudors  
  
  The Stuarts  
  
  Mysteries  
  
  Book Talk  
  
  Tudor Topics  
  
  Crusades  
  
  RBOR  
  
  WOTR  
  
  Right Royal Xmas  
  
  Royal Holidays  
  
  Misc Pages  
  ♦AMT Member Map  
  ♦AMT Member List  
  ♦This Week in History  
  ♦Castle of the Day  
  ♦AMT Goes to the Movies  
  ♦Lovely Links  
  ♦Brilliant Books  
  ♦Royal Begats  
  ♦The Royal Book of Records  
  ♦The Crusades  
  ♦The Wars of the Roses  
  ♦Six Wives  
  ♦Off With Her Head  
  ♦The Reformation in England  
  ♦The Tudors and the Tower  
  ♫Tudor Music  
  ♦Tudor Limericks  
  ♦Elizabethan Insults  
  ♦Elizabethan Dressing  
  ♦Elizabethan Makeup  
  ♦The Invincible Armada  
  ♦The Great Fire of London  
    
  Pictures  
  Manager Tools  
  
  
  Tools  
 
The Plantagenets : WOTR Politics
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 2 in Discussion 
From: Greensleeves  (Original Message)Sent: 5/8/2006 12:48 AM
Why didn't Richard Duke of York seize the throne for himself when he defeated Henry VI at the battle of Northhampton?  Why did he just agree to become Henry's heir instead?

Then Edward IV took up the Yorkist cause & successfully ousted Henry VI.  What changed in the political climate of England to make the overthrow of Henry more acceptable in Edward's time, such a short time later?  Did it have anything to do with what happened at Sandal?


First  Previous  2 of 2  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 2 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameMarkGB5Sent: 5/8/2006 9:23 PM
It is rather a puzzle, but the most likely explanation is the Richard wanted to be recognized as the rightful King, not by conquest but by right of blood, by the Lords assembled. When he put his case to the Lords in October 1460 they baulked at deposing their annointed King and Richard was persuaded to accept the Accord and become heir. However the manner of his death at Wakefield and the treatment of the bodies plus the execution of prisoners meant that his son Edward, who was a stronger character, would settle for nothing less than the Crown.