MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
ALL MY TUDORS...history chat[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  ♦Greetings!  
  ♦Bits & Pieces  
  ♦Death & Burial  
  ♦Brasses & Monuments  
  Read this BEFORE you apply for membership!  
  ♦Group Guidelines  
  ♦To the Boards  
  ♦Message Board  
  
  General  
  
  The Dark Ages  
  
  The Normans  
  
  The Plantagenets  
  
  The Tudors  
  
  The Stuarts  
  
  Mysteries  
  
  Book Talk  
  
  Tudor Topics  
  
  Crusades  
  
  RBOR  
  
  WOTR  
  
  Right Royal Xmas  
  
  Royal Holidays  
  
  Misc Pages  
  ♦AMT Member Map  
  ♦AMT Member List  
  ♦This Week in History  
  ♦Castle of the Day  
  ♦AMT Goes to the Movies  
  ♦Lovely Links  
  ♦Brilliant Books  
  ♦Royal Begats  
  ♦The Royal Book of Records  
  ♦The Crusades  
  ♦The Wars of the Roses  
  ♦Six Wives  
  ♦Off With Her Head  
  ♦The Reformation in England  
  ♦The Tudors and the Tower  
  ♫Tudor Music  
  ♦Tudor Limericks  
  ♦Elizabethan Insults  
  ♦Elizabethan Dressing  
  ♦Elizabethan Makeup  
  ♦The Invincible Armada  
  ♦The Great Fire of London  
    
  Pictures  
  Manager Tools  
  
  
  Tools  
 
The Stuarts : James II Abdication
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 5 in Discussion 
From: Berengaria  (Original Message)Sent: 12/11/2002 5:31 AM
TDIH says that James II abdicated the throne today.  I am not as up on the Stuarts as I am the Plantagenets, but I dimly recall something about him fleeing in terror & throwing the royal seal into the Thames?  Is that technically an abdication?


First  Previous  2-5 of 5  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 5 in Discussion 
From: Sleepy ElfSent: 12/11/2002 1:48 PM
James II left for France after William of Orange gave orders to his men to allow him to escape if he wished to. James threw the Great Seal into the Thames and managed to reach the continent. William declared that he had abdicated as he had deserted the country...but an abdication under extreme pressure where you have no real choice is no abdication...like they say of Mary Queen of Scots abdication.....

Reply
 Message 3 of 5 in Discussion 
From: Anne of ClevesSent: 12/11/2002 9:51 PM
From what I have read about him so far in the book "William's Mary", William III was being extremely kind to him by giving him the option to flee.  He surely suffered a better fate than Charles I did.  He never helped William nor his daughter when  they were being troubled by French, and his plot to exclude his daughters from inheriting the throne because they were protestant by the "changeling" prince.
 
I would say it was more of an "overthrow" than abdication... then again, perhaps since he didn't put up resistance (think War of the Roses) it was termed an abdication.
 
Those descendants of Edward III surely are an interesting lot!  Then again, what can be expected from the descenants of Longshanks LOL

Reply
 Message 4 of 5 in Discussion 
From: Anne of ClevesSent: 12/11/2002 9:55 PM
When I say "Longshanks" I meant Edward I.... inteteresting character indeed.... "breeding out the Scots".... LOL the things he did

Reply
 Message 5 of 5 in Discussion 
From: Sleepy ElfSent: 12/12/2002 10:58 AM
William of Orange allowed James II to escape to France as he was extremely shrewd.  If he had James II executed, or imprisoned and later dying mysteriously, he would have been called an usurper as Henry IV was after Richard II imprisonment.  The country probably would have descended into chaos, and William couldnt afford that.  The people hated Charles I until he was executed, and at the time civil war and regicide were the things that people most of all wished to avoid.  William knew that James would counter-attack...but without help from France James would be more or less powerless..and Louis wasnt all that willing after a while to help out.  I think that if William had acted like Cromwell, then people would have rallied around James more...as I think they would have done if they truely believed that Cromwell would execute Charles I.  Maureen Waller makes a good point in her book "Ungrateful Daughters", when James II is in disguise in a local inn.  She states that once the King had been recognised, the local people felt humbled and tried to kiss his hand...but James roughly pushed them away.  If it had been Chalres II in his place, he probabaly would have been able to make it  into a great victory and get the people to carry him back to Whitehall, but James just  didnt  have his charisma....

First  Previous  2-5 of 5  Next  Last 
Return to The Stuarts