MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
ALL MY TUDORS...history chat[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  ♦Greetings!  
  ♦Bits & Pieces  
  ♦Death & Burial  
  ♦Brasses & Monuments  
  Read this BEFORE you apply for membership!  
  ♦Group Guidelines  
  ♦To the Boards  
  ♦Message Board  
  
  General  
  
  The Dark Ages  
  
  The Normans  
  
  The Plantagenets  
  
  The Tudors  
  
  The Stuarts  
  
  Mysteries  
  
  Book Talk  
  
  Tudor Topics  
  
  Crusades  
  
  RBOR  
  
  WOTR  
  
  Right Royal Xmas  
  
  Royal Holidays  
  
  Misc Pages  
  ♦AMT Member Map  
  ♦AMT Member List  
  ♦This Week in History  
  ♦Castle of the Day  
  ♦AMT Goes to the Movies  
  ♦Lovely Links  
  ♦Brilliant Books  
  ♦Royal Begats  
  ♦The Royal Book of Records  
  ♦The Crusades  
  ♦The Wars of the Roses  
  ♦Six Wives  
  ♦Off With Her Head  
  ♦The Reformation in England  
  ♦The Tudors and the Tower  
  ♫Tudor Music  
  ♦Tudor Limericks  
  ♦Elizabethan Insults  
  ♦Elizabethan Dressing  
  ♦Elizabethan Makeup  
  ♦The Invincible Armada  
  ♦The Great Fire of London  
    
  Pictures  
  Manager Tools  
  
  
  Tools  
 
The Stuarts : Fatal February
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknameterrilee62  (Original Message)Sent: 2/9/2008 4:19 PM
Even tho I really should be working, can't help but post on this list since I noticed these February dates - February 9, 1567 - Death of Lord Darnley.  February 8, 1587 - Execution of Mary Queen of Scots.  I knew that she was a prisoner in England for nearly 20 years but had not realized that their death dates were within a day of being exactly 20 years apart. 
 
How odd is that?
 
Checking Wiki, Darnley's full titles were:  His Grace the King {actually King Consort, a courtesy title from Mary}, His Grace The Duke of Albany, The Rt. Hon. The Earl of Ross, yet to history, he is always known simply as Darnley.  An interesting paragraph from the wiki article:  His marriage to Mary, Queen of Scots, was a disaster. Darnley was younger than Mary and not particularly mature for a 19-year-old. He possessed a fondness for cross-dressing. He was unpopular with the other nobles and had a mean and violent streak.
 


First  Previous  2-8 of 8  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameMarkGB5Sent: 2/9/2008 8:39 PM
Lord Darnley was actually killed in the early hours of 10 February. He and Mary almost shared a birthday too, Mary was born on 8 December 1542 and Darnley on 7 December 1545.

Reply
 Message 3 of 8 in Discussion 
From: GreensleevesSent: 2/11/2008 8:58 AM
Don't forget Catherine Howard & Jane Rochford on your February fatalities list....February 13th....& Lady Jane Grey....also February 9th

Reply
 Message 4 of 8 in Discussion 
From: GreensleevesSent: 2/11/2008 8:59 AM
O & that miserable Guildford Dudley LOL....I always forget him.  Methinks he was axed a day or 2 before Jane, I forget atm

Reply
 Message 5 of 8 in Discussion 
From: GreensleevesSent: 2/11/2008 9:02 AM
Back up the truck....are they confusing Darnley with the French guy?  Crossdressing?

Reply
 Message 6 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknametudorgalusaSent: 2/11/2008 7:51 PM
I never heard of Darnley crossdressing, he has been described as "pretty" with rather feminine features and I do believe he was bi-sexual.  He was very immature to be a husband to a queen and he was violent and unpredictable. 
 
 
Tudorgalusa

Reply
 Message 7 of 8 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameMarkGB5Sent: 2/11/2008 9:03 PM
Ref # 4. Jane and her husband were both beheaded on 12 February 1554 (the anniversary tomorrow), Lord Guilford first, she had to walk past his headless body.

Reply
 Message 8 of 8 in Discussion 
From: ForeverAmberSent: 2/12/2008 3:04 AM
Mark's correct; it was the 11th that Jane sent a request to Mary to visit Guildford, (but was denied) so that may be where the day before confusion arises.  Mary signed her death warrant on the 7th & Jane was told to prepare herself on the 8th.  It's said Mary gave her a few extra days because she was hoping Jane would recant her Protestant beliefs by sending over her own chaplain to urge Jane to convert to Catholicism; Jane told him she "had no time" for such nonsense & the priest interpreted this litearally, encouraging Mary to think that with some instruction Jane would repent of her heretic ways.  Jane apparently so impressed him with her firm faith that he requested that she permit him to accompany her to the scaffold, which she granted.  Mary was sensitivity to the end, making Jane pass by Guildford's headless corpse being trundled off.  Five more minutes was going to hurt?

First  Previous  2-8 of 8  Next  Last 
Return to The Stuarts