My theory of war...
Give the leaders the guns. Put them both in some forest somewhere with a pocket full of bullets.
In the case of Iraq, W and Saddam each get one gun and a pocketfull of bullets in some forrest somewhere.
The man that walks out wins. Then they can implement whatever policy they want.
This way we save all the infrastructure destruction, all the young people being killed, and all the waste. PLUS I have this hunch, that if Mr. Bush or ANY leader for that matter, knew it was HIS or HER butt on the line, and gonna be shot at, that a diplomatic solution might be found to these problems between states.
This thing of old men sending young men off to die, is just nuts. Where did we dream this up? And why, oh why, did we young men ever agree to it? It's just the craziest thing I ever heard of, when you look at it like that. So where did it come from and why do we do it? LOLOL
I would say the same thing if the president were Democratic and started a war, by the way. Doesn't matter the party, it's the fact they it's never THEM who's actually in harm's way. AND in fact, if you want to look it, go to each and ever Senator and Congressman's web site, and see how many of them are telling us they have a son or daughter over in Irag being shot at.
Don't bother, I can tell you. According to what research I've been able to do, it's less than 10%. Oh they talk big. But when it comes to action, it's a different story.
Also, almost none of the neo-conservative leaders who are so hawkish have ever worn the uniform of a branch of any of the armed services. Paul Wolfowitz... Nope. Karl Rove... Nope. Irv Chenay... nope. It goes on and on. W. himself of course was an allegedly AWOL AF Reservist so he wouldn't have to go to the war in Viet Nam, and the one person who does have a respectable history as a fine officer, the current Secretary of State, Collin Powel, is not a neo-conservative himself, but rather an old line conservative from the Regean tradition. AND he was NOT hawkish in this invasion of Iraq, though he tries to toe the line as a good soldier should.
OK enough ranting. I think you get the point. Those who love war, never fought in one. Those who know what a horrible, terrible waste and what a frightening and gut wrencing experience it is, know it should be something that's an absolute last resort.
And when we do go to war, we should do it, get in, get the job done and get out. Our army isn't trained, nor is it's mission nation building. It's mission has always been, and it's trained for fighting and taking territory. But that's another rant.
Dan