The world may not come to an end, but the “free�?world as we know it, has

The 2008 U.S.A. Election

When Ontarians woke-up in the now infamous election, the day after the NDP was chosen, they dropped their collective jaws in disbelief. What had they done? The rest is history, Bob Rae put Ontario on the path of a have-not province, which just happened under the wonderful mismanagement of the LIEberals. You see, protest votes don’t work, and Bob Rae was a protest vote.

Obama also is a protest vote. Politically ignorant people, the overwhelming number of voters both in the U.S and in Canada, vote with their hearts not with their brains. The result? TRUDEAU, RAE, OBAMA! All disasters. No. McCain didn’t lose the election, “Doubya�?did. This was a protest vote, not a vote for Obama. Unfortunately, the ignorant voters are never able to measure the consequences and, in this case, they will be felt for a long time to come.
 
Politics is a science and it takes a long time to learn the ins and outs of it. For example, people should look at the record of both candidates. Poll after poll showed that McCain was considered more experienced and more capable than Barack Hussein Obama. Obama has failed to show proof of anything he said he has done. He refused to demonstrate that he indeed qualifies for the presidency, as a natural-born American. In fact, I’d like to take it a step further. If he were a natural born American, would he have refused to prove it? McCain did when he was asked the same question. Why did Obama refuse to produce his records from any learning institution that he attended? They all show his place of birth! He’s the most secretive of all candidates for president in the history of the U.S., and the most liberal too. Even further than that. If Obama turns out to not be a natural-born American, he’s not any kind of American, since it does not appear to have acquired the citizenship by request. It does seem though that he was registered in Indonesian schools as “Indonesian�?as well as a Muslim. Oh that’s not a problem, freedom of religion is in the constitution, but denying it is a lie and therefore it’s defrauding the American voter. So which is it, Mr. President elect?
 
So why did he win? There are several reasons.
 
First, the protest vote. People were fed-up with Bush, although history will be a lot kinder to him than his contemporaries have been. The Patriot Act was a necessity after 9/11. The proof is that there hasn’t been another such attack on American soil, and that some were uncovered before hand.There was NO choice and any president would have done the same thing regardless of his party’s colour. The war on Iraq was a must to show radical Muslims the dangers of attacking America. Mission accomplished. incidentally, the war’s being won, but the liberal media buried all evidence in its newsrooms, so Americans didn’t know about it, while the media hammered images, print and televised comments of every American who died in Iraq. Is this what journalism is supposed to be? It would be if you lived in Nazi Germany!
 
Let’s face it. The big media is totally corrupt, dishonest, conniving, biased and un-American. They had picked a nobody from nowhere (the darling of the Bilderbergers, Trilateral Commission and the likes), and pulled a McDonald’s on us. Not much meat, but a great advertising build-up. There are so many questionable things about the president elect that several books have been filled with them. Where did Obama get the money for all his great schooling? Remember “deep throat�?in the Watergate scandal? Follow the money, he said. What did the big media do? Bury all that is unfavourable to their messiah, of course. They didn’t want to hurt the chances of their candidate, did they? Another great question: why do Farrakhan, Al Qaida, Hamas, Hezbollah, Ahmadinejad, et all support Obama? Are they not (or most of them) the enemies of The “Great Satan�?a.k.a the U.S.A.?
 
What did Obama have to offer? Not a great deal of good things. But, he is a lefty! He could say with a straight face that he was FOR CHANGE. What kind of change? No one knows to this date, but he’s the president elect. Is change always good, not if it is for the worse! Unless you’re an ignorant hypocrite and change is ALWAYS good in your silly mind, if it is to turf out the Republicans. He had to offer just pure and simple, rehearsed charisma as proved when he was without a teleprompter, and failed miserably.
 
Of course there’re the continuous relationships with shady or outright undesirable characters, that would have been the kiss of death of any republican candidate. There’s his radical anti-American pastor who said the most outrageous things while Obama sat there and nodded. William Ayers and Bernardine Dorhn, anti-American terrorists, Rezko, Frank Marshall Davis, Malcom X, Stokely Carmichael and Frantz Fanon, Saul Alinksy, Kenyan Prime Minister Raila Odinga. 
 
Just compare the attitude of the media towards Obama, to the frantic, vicious “investigation�?of the trashcans of Alaska, in search of something, anything, which could discredit Sarah Palin. Did they find anything? Of course not. Did that stop them, of course not. They came-up with the lowest form of snake attacks, accusing Mr. Palin of being the father of his daughter’s child! How low can they go? Very low, trust me is a trait of Marxism. Oh, they also accused her of impropriety in firing a trooper. Naturally, she’s been cleared of any wrongdoing. Do you expect to see that in the front pages of the big media?
 
Second reason is the economic meltdown. That was a killer for the “incumbent party.�?The big media, of course, hid the fact that it was the hypocrats (dems) who caused the bad loans to be made, under the pretence that “more people would be able to buy a home,�?regardless of the more conservative thinking that, if you cannot afford it, you must not buy it.
 
McCain made, in my opinion, a huge mistake by not declaring himself against any corporate bail-outs, which is the true conservative position. The vote would have passed anyway, since there were more hypocrats than conservatives to vote, but at least John would not have been tainted.
 
You see, any time politicians act wishy-washy, ignorant voters choose the real McCoy. That is the perennial wish-washers, the hypocrats.
 
Third reason is the number of well intentioned social-conservatives who disagreed with the more moderate McCain and decided not to vote for him. Well, friends, you got your wish, John is not the president elect. Do you feel better now?
 
Forth reason, of course, as hinted before, is the big media. In my journalist studies, they taught me that journalism was reporting the news. Well the North American big media is all about fabricating the news. Something doesn’t agree with the media’s agenda? They will change it, no problem. A responsible media has the obligation of protecting the interest of the nation and its constitution. Now, that’s a laugh! Not only Obama wasn’t vetted by them as it would have been their duty, but things not favourable to him were hidden from the voter’s view or changed to accommodate their messiah.
 
Now, this is the reason why intelligent people get their news nowadays from the Internet, which is the reason why Obama will try to regulate the Internet, impose again the “fairness doctrine,�?and cancel O’Reilly Glen Beck, Rush Limbaugh, et all. About the “fairness doctrine...�?How come they never forced the big media to be truthful in reporting, nor forced them to give Conservatives the equal space to rebut?
 
What now America, are you going to let these questions go unanswered?

Joseph Gamero
CFP