MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
ALL MY TUDORS...history chat[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  ♦Greetings!  
  ♦Bits & Pieces  
  ♦Death & Burial  
  ♦Brasses & Monuments  
  Read this BEFORE you apply for membership!  
  ♦Group Guidelines  
  ♦To the Boards  
  ♦Message Board  
  ♦AMT Member Map  
  ♦AMT Member List  
  ♦This Week in History  
  ♦Castle of the Day  
  ♦AMT Goes to the Movies  
  
  Coming Soon  
  
  On the tele  
  
  Marvelous Movies  
  ♦Lovely Links  
  ♦Brilliant Books  
  ♦Royal Begats  
  ♦The Royal Book of Records  
  ♦The Crusades  
  ♦The Wars of the Roses  
  ♦Six Wives  
  ♦Off With Her Head  
  ♦The Reformation in England  
  ♦The Tudors and the Tower  
  ♫Tudor Music  
  ♦Tudor Limericks  
  ♦Elizabethan Insults  
  ♦Elizabethan Dressing  
  ♦Elizabethan Makeup  
  ♦The Invincible Armada  
  ♦The Great Fire of London  
    
  Pictures  
  Manager Tools  
  
  
  Tools  
 
Coming Soon : Other Boleyn Girl goes from Novel to Film
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 55 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknamebratboy197  (Original Message)Sent: 6/21/2006 5:27 PM
From Comingsoon.com

Portman and Bana Join Other Boleyn Girl
Source: Variety
June 21, 2006


Sony Pictures is lining up Natalie Portman and Eric Bana to topline The Other Boleyn Girl, based on Philippa Gregory's historical novel, reports Variety.

Justin Chadwick is directing the movie, which Scott Rudin Productions, Ruby Films and BBC Films are producing.

Peter Morgan wrote the adaptation of the book, which tells the story of two ferociously ambitious sisters, Mary and Anne (Portman) Boleyn, who were rivals for the bed and heart of the King Henry VIII (Bana).

Focus Features is in discussions to take international rights on the pic. Sony will distribute domestically. Shooting is scheduled to begin this fall in London.


First  Previous  41-55 of 55  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 41 of 55 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknamechairbornerangerSent: 3/18/2008 1:24 PM
Painter-
Thanks for the giggle! Melanie

Reply
 Message 42 of 55 in Discussion 
From: GreensleevesSent: 3/19/2008 4:17 AM
Review HERE also....love the bit where they says "Your eyes will probably roll before any heads do" LOL

Reply
 Message 43 of 55 in Discussion 
From: GreensleevesSent: 3/30/2008 1:56 AM
Philippa Gregory defends her incest angle HERE.....what do you think of it?

Reply
 Message 44 of 55 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameboleynfanSent: 3/30/2008 7:55 PM
One sentence by Gregory in this article reveals a lot.  She states, "Anne Boleyn was a most determined woman who had not shied away from murder to get her own way in the past."
 
Murder?  Just exactly who did Anne Boleyn murder?  No wonder she thought nothing of Anne bedding her brother...that was nothing compared to murder...
 
Don't mind a bit of artistic license for better defining a story, i.e., Elizabeth meeting Mary QOS in the Redgrave film.  This "murder" mentioned as fact by Gregory is, excuse my language, pulled straight out of her %# .  Gregory is clearly delusional.  Gregory should not have another book published...ever!

Reply
 Message 45 of 55 in Discussion 
From: GreensleevesSent: 3/30/2008 10:06 PM
Mayhap Gregory counts Wolsey, More, & Fisher among Anne's "victims"?   As you're quite right, WTF is she on about with this "murder" angle?

Reply
 Message 46 of 55 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameLegendaryLisette7Sent: 3/31/2008 11:11 AM
I was amazed by this sentence as well.  Surely she'll have to explain what she means?
 
Perhaps many people did believe the charges against Anne, but the story isn't told from THEIR POV.  That would be different - the book suggested that this possibly did happen and many stupid viewers of the film are also going to wonder if Anne really did this.  They might even believe that she did.
 
I will see the film but I was so upset by the book that I've decided never to read another book by Philippa Gregory.
 
Many people improve their careers by being controversial and getting more publicity.  She comes into this category at the expense of Anne.  Historians agree that there was no evidence for the charges against her and certainly not the charge of incest.
 
I will read other historical novelists, such as Jean Plaidy, in future.
 
www.bookaddiction.blogspot.com

Reply
 Message 47 of 55 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknamewalking_jukebox_58Sent: 4/18/2008 11:45 AM
I thought, although it looked fantastic, and the costumes were beautiful, that it was a pretty pitiful effort, considering that Philippa Gregory worked on the film. It moved way to fast, and if someone who knew nothing about history went to seem, they would either think it was a spot on representation of historical events, or they would be completely confused.
Plus did any one else note that in the credits, it said "these characters are completely ficticous" that is a complete insult to anyone who considers themselves a supporter of the Tudors, and the history!

Reply
 Message 48 of 55 in Discussion 
From: GreensleevesSent: 5/26/2008 2:52 PM
I found a British telly site with a video short on the Kent locations used in the shooting of the movie....none of which was Hever   HERE if you want a lil inside look.

Reply
 Message 49 of 55 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameReplacedJudymarSent: 5/28/2008 9:37 PM
As bad as TOBG was, her "The Constant Princess" was worse!

Reply
 Message 50 of 55 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknameterrilee62Sent: 5/29/2008 1:40 PM
ITA Judymar!  I so wanted to like 'The Constant Princess', as I have a great admiration for K of A - in fact for almost all of Henry's wives (except for the ditsy Katherine Howard).    While I can believe that Arthur & Katherine were 'in love' as teenagers often think they are, it is shown as the great passion of her life.  Also, with Arthur & Katherine as lovers, it paints Katherine as coldly & deliberately lying about her virginity in order to marry Henry - all the while she pined for her dead Arthur.  The book focuses on her early years & marriage to Arthur - and summarizes the years she spent as Henry's queen in a few short pages.   I guess the 'Constant' in the title is referring to her ongoing love for Arthur....

Reply
 Message 51 of 55 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameGeorgina62Sent: 5/29/2008 1:47 PM
I'm currently reading a book, called the other Boleyn girl which I beleive is by the same author, I cannot check as the book is in my shop and I'm at home ill, anyway this book is written from the perspective of a young jewish girl, who ends up at the court as a fool to Edward and asked to be a spy by Robert Dudley.
 
I really cannot remember where this book came from, or why I haven't read it before, but I'm really enjoying it, but up until now it is about Mary and Elizabeth, so where the title came from I don't know, perhaps all will be revealed later on.
 
Is this the book you are referring to, I wonder.

Reply
 Message 52 of 55 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameReplacedJudymarSent: 5/29/2008 3:26 PM
That book is "The Queen's Fool", not sure of the title, but it's not TOBG. I've read both, but am terrible with titles. It was also by Philippa Gregory.

Reply
 Message 53 of 55 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameMaryK6181Sent: 5/29/2008 11:02 PM
The book actually got me re-interested in the Tudors for awhile I was WW2/Holocaust focused. It was a pretty good read but the movie was pretty bad. One key character and scene was missing for me.

Reply
 Message 54 of 55 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameGeorgina62Sent: 5/30/2008 2:15 PM
"Scuse" have just retrieved my book and you are quite right, it is called The Fool but it's in small letters at the bottom of the cover, but in larger letters it says from the author of The other Boleyn Girl, I must have been having a Senior moment when I snatched it from my book shelf, and I'm not well.
 
I have recently re- read The Lady in the Tower by Jean Plaidy, have any of you read it? ( silly question )
 
Have tried whilst at home to PLOUGH through Elizabeth by David Starkey, my husband bought me a signed copy for a present, I have to say that if this had been my first introduction to the subject, I would NEVER  been the least bit interested, how he can turn such an interesting subject into such a boring read I don't know.

Reply
 Message 55 of 55 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameDylandorSent: 6/1/2008 3:43 AM
Who is your favorite non-fiction author of Tudor history? I didn't think David Starkey was so bad...what's wrong with him?
 

First  Previous  41-55 of 55  Next  Last 
Return to Coming Soon