|
|
Reply
| | From: GIPPO99 (Original Message) | Sent: 12/7/2008 1:46 AM |
playing a tourney today I made this x after the 2c for partner to bid After the hand I was told it is alertable I said I had no agreement and director called etc why is this an alert? I was told by director that std is penalty so my x is an alert I am a passed hand how can I have enough to x for penalty here? IMPs east Pairs Board 7 Dlr: South darla Vul: Both S KQ92 north east south west H K942 rkd darla SLANG ginny99 D AT3 C 62 pass pass north south 1D X 2C X rkd SLANG pass 2H (all pass) S AJ53 S 7 H QT H A65 Opening Lead: CJ D Q652 D J97 Result: +3 C KQ8 C JT9743 Score: 100, IMPs: 4.71 west Playing time: 5:56 ginny99 S T864 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 H J873 N 8 T Q-HQ-D2 S5 3 5 A-D6 J CK DQ D K84 E 2 K 6 2 T-H4 Q-D3 2 A-SK-S9 9 C A5 S CJ A-CT 5 9 6 7 7 C3 J C4 C7 C9 |
|
Reply
| |
Thinking about this logically, the double promises support for all of the unbid suits. Therefore my rule was, from the bridge encyclopaedia, when playing responsive doubles the only true responsive double would be when the opponent's would simply raise the opener's suit. It is a situation that I will often clarify with my partner while reviewing CC. I think the new treatment seems to have abandoned this method as there are too many players who do not appreciate the joy of playing doubled contracts, "win or lose". I would have left it in. However it is also suggested that many players would only choose to punish a major suit overcall. Not illogical. Gosh bridge can be fun sometmes. |
|
Reply
| |
It was a responsive double of sorts, and responsive doubles are not alertable. Check your convention card, Testiestcat, they are black. I can't imagine a competent director saying that double was alertable. Yikes! You're right JoAnne, they're black. These darn doubles come up so seldom, especially since the Alert for responsive has been removed, that I still have my head in the sand as to when the red turned to black. Thanks, JoAnne. In any case, this is another example of a SWAN director making a non-mainstream ruling. I won't express my opinion on this matter. |
|
Reply
| | From: Darla2 | Sent: 12/7/2008 4:46 PM |
And YIKES, again, Edward! This ACBL tourney was not played at Swan! |
|
Reply
| | From: JoAnneM | Sent: 12/7/2008 4:55 PM |
I think I may have found the area of confusion for Ginny's director. Here is info from ACBL concerning these doubles: PART IV: DOUBLES, REDOUBLES AND PASSES Except for those doubles with highly unusual or unexpected meanings, doubles do not require an Alert. |
|
Reply
| |
I play in this sequence the double as optimal, stating that I have some tolerance of clubs, but do have another place to play, with some values. Even if it's responsive, whoever ruled that this was alertable needs to reread the Alert chart. |
|
Reply
| |
1D X 2C X is not a responsive dbl. A responsive dbl is when responder raises opener's suit. Since responder did not raise opener's suit, this is a penalty dbl. Looking at advancer's hand shows that advancer meant this dbl as takeout, similar to a responsive dbl. Since the partnership has no agreement about this dbl, how can it be alertable? Advancer is hoping that takeout dbler will take it as showing both majors. Although you are lite, maybe you should have bid 2D showing 10+ with both majors or GF. |
|
Reply
| |
I learned that these both were responsive doubles: 1C 1anything 2C X 1C X 2C X in the first case i would be showing the two unbid suits. In the second case, I would be showing both majors, since if I only had one of the majors i would freely bid it. |
|
Reply
| |
amend my last post to read: One of my partnerships plays responsive doubles and this is how we learned to play them.... Here is a good site that discusses responsive doubles and the possibilities: |
|
Reply
| |
I play them the same way as nbraun except in the 1c x 2c x it's not "both majors" it's "you pick pard" |
|
Reply
| |
in the 1x Dbl 2x Dbl responsive dbl situation, it shows either both minors if a major was bid or both majors if a minor was bid. Let me explain. When the bidding goes 1x Dbl 2x ? if you have one major, you should bid it. Ignore any other suits unless you have the strength and chance to bid a 2nd time. So the only situation where you want the takeout dbler to "Pick 'em" is when you either have both majors or no major. Therefore, the responsive dbl of a minor shows both majors because if you had a major and minor, you would bid your major and the responsive dbl of a major shows both minors because if you had a major and a minor, you would bid your major. Is that simple and obvious? Is it understandable? Do you need examples? |
|
Reply
| |
I understand, but don't agree. Say you are 4243 and it went 1c dbl 2c If I have a very good hand I don't want to just bid 2S (or 3S). I want to hear what pard says. This is all premised on the fact that my hand is very good. In other words "you pick pard" means my hand is so good I think I should become captain. With worse hands I agree with prior (worse means a hand that plans on passing pards non jump response. I suppose bidding 3c could fit in here somewhere too 1c dbl 2c 3c not sure what that should mean but probably some sort of nt try. |
|
Reply
| |
So takeout dbler bids 2H... now what do you bid with your 4342? or 4243 or whatever. And if takeout dbler is 3442, do you think takeout dbler will bid 2D to find the 4-4 diam fit? Think about it Joe. Your example makes no sense. |
|
Reply
| |
I understand and agree completely you make the bids as you suggest when weak. Your hand is fully strong enough to handle any "bad answers from pard. Ypi might get lucky and get a diamond or spd response 1c dbl 2c 2bl 2h p 2S This would show a good jand with 4S and less than 4H I see know reason why: 1c dbl 2c 2bl 2x p p Say I have ture crappolla but tolerance for any suit and feel it's more likely we will get to the right place in your best suit, pard. I could easily be 3422 and bid hearts and get passed when paed is 4342 and the spd moysian is better.. |
|
Reply
| |
Quite nice problem from OP.
I would love to agree with partner to use 1D Db 2C Db as hand showing both majors, as vs. SAYC i could bid Diamonds naturally:
1D Db 2C 2D with xx,xx,QJ10xxx,Kxx.
Cheers, Vlastimil
|
|
Reply
| |
I would be playing that the double in that sequence was for penalty: 1D X 2C X |
|
|
|