MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
MSN Bridge ClubActively managed by MSN.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Message Board  
  Play Online  
  Swan Download  
  Bridge Reference  
  Pictures  
  Links  
  Ingberman  
  Imp Strategy  
  Rev Drury  
  Hand Templates  
  Alert Chart  
  Bridge Basics  
  Members Art Work  
  
  
  Tools  
 
All Message Boards : x question
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
Recommend  Message 1 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameGIPPO99  (Original Message)Sent: 12/7/2008 1:46 AM
playing a tourney today  I made this x  after the 2c  for partner to bid    After the hand I was  told it is alertable I said I had no agreement and director  called etc  why is this an alert?    I was told by director  that std is penalty so  my x is an alert   I am a passed hand how can I have enough to x for penalty here?
 
IMPs            east                      Pairs Board 7
Dlr: South      darla
Vul: Both       S KQ92                    north    east     south    west
                H K942                    rkd      darla    SLANG    ginny99
                D AT3
                C 62                                        pass     pass
    north                  south          1D       X        2C       X
    rkd                    SLANG          pass     2H       (all pass)
    S AJ53                 S 7
    H QT                   H A65          Opening Lead: CJ
    D Q652                 D J97          Result: +3
    C KQ8                  C JT9743       Score: 100,  IMPs:   4.71
                west                      Playing time: 5:56
                ginny99
                S T864                    1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 10 11 12 13
                H J873                 N  8  T  Q-HQ-D2 S5  3  5  A-D6  J CK DQ
                D K84                  E  2  K  6  2  T-H4  Q-D3  2  A-SK-S9  9
                C A5                   S CJ  A-CT  5  9  6  7  7 C3  J C4 C7 C9
                      


First  Previous  10-24 of 24  Next  Last 
Reply
Recommend  Message 10 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknamegordiwithanrSent: 12/7/2008 2:08 PM
Thinking about this logically, the double promises support for all of the unbid suits. Therefore my  rule was,  from the bridge encyclopaedia, when playing responsive doubles the only true responsive double would be when the opponent's would simply raise the opener's suit. It is a situation that I will often clarify with my partner while reviewing CC. I think the new treatment seems to have abandoned this method as there are too many players who do not appreciate the joy of playing doubled contracts, "win or lose". I would have left it in. However it is also suggested that many players would only choose to punish a major suit overcall. Not illogical. Gosh bridge can be fun sometmes.

Reply
Recommend  Message 11 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknametestiestcat1Sent: 12/7/2008 4:04 PM
It was a responsive double of sorts, and responsive doubles are not alertable.  Check your convention card, Testiestcat, they are black.  I can't imagine a competent director saying that double was alertable.
 
Yikes! You're right JoAnne, they're black. These darn doubles come up so seldom, especially since the Alert for responsive has been removed, that I still have my head in the sand as to when the red turned to black.    Thanks, JoAnne.
 
In any case, this is another example of a SWAN director making a non-mainstream ruling. I won't express my opinion on this matter.

Reply
Recommend  Message 12 of 24 in Discussion 
From: Darla2Sent: 12/7/2008 4:46 PM
And YIKES, again, Edward! This ACBL tourney was not played at Swan!
 
 

Reply
Recommend  Message 13 of 24 in Discussion 
From: JoAnneMSent: 12/7/2008 4:55 PM
I think I may have found the area of confusion for Ginny's director.  Here is info from ACBL concerning these doubles:
 

PART IV: DOUBLES, REDOUBLES AND PASSES

Except for those doubles with highly unusual or unexpected meanings, doubles do not require an Alert.

    1-P-4 (splinter bid)-Dbl
    If this double asks for the lead of any suit other than clubs, an Alert is required.

    1-Dbl or 1-P-1-Dbl
    If either double is penalty or lead directing only, an Alert is required.

    3-Dbl or 3-P-P-Dbl
    If either double is penalty, an Alert is required

    In the 2nd example is her auction.  You will see that is says that if the bid is penalty ONLY, then the bid is alertable.   Ginny's bid was takeout, which is the standard meaning, so it was not alertable.   This is similar to 1c-2c you  alert when 2c means clubs!


     


Reply
Recommend  Message 14 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknamekey_lime_precisionSent: 12/7/2008 6:32 PM
I play in this sequence the double as optimal, stating that I have some tolerance of clubs, but do have another place to play, with some values. Even if it's responsive, whoever ruled that this was alertable needs to reread the Alert chart.

Reply
Recommend  Message 15 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknamePriorKnowledgeSent: 12/8/2008 11:57 PM
1D X 2C X is not a responsive dbl. A responsive dbl is when responder raises opener's suit. Since responder did not raise opener's suit, this is a penalty dbl.
 
Looking at advancer's hand shows that advancer meant this dbl as takeout, similar to a responsive dbl. Since the partnership has no agreement about this dbl, how can it be alertable? Advancer is hoping that takeout dbler will take it as showing both majors.
 
Although you are lite, maybe you should have bid 2D showing 10+ with both majors or GF.

Reply
Recommend  Message 16 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknamenbraun0411Sent: 12/9/2008 1:24 PM
I learned that these both were responsive doubles:
 
1C  1anything  2C  X
 
1C   X   2C   X
 
in the first case i would be showing the two unbid suits.  In the second case, I would be showing both majors, since if I only had one of the majors i would freely bid it.

Reply
Recommend  Message 17 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknamenbraun0411Sent: 12/9/2008 1:30 PM
amend my last post to read:
 
One of my partnerships plays responsive doubles and this is how we learned to play them....
 
Here is a good site that discusses responsive doubles and the possibilities:
 

Reply
Recommend  Message 18 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBartonFinchleySent: 12/9/2008 6:33 PM
I play them the same way as nbraun   except in the 1c  x  2c   x   it's not "both majors"  it's "you pick pard" 

Reply
Recommend  Message 19 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknamePriorKnowledgeSent: 12/9/2008 6:54 PM
in the 1x Dbl 2x Dbl responsive dbl situation, it shows either both minors if a major was bid or both majors if a minor was bid.
 
Let me explain. When the bidding goes 1x Dbl 2x ? if you have one major, you should bid it. Ignore any other suits unless you have the strength and chance to bid a 2nd time. So the only situation where you want the takeout dbler to "Pick 'em" is when you either have both majors or no major. Therefore, the responsive dbl of a minor shows both majors because if you had a major and minor, you would bid your major and the responsive dbl of a major shows both minors because if you had a major and a minor, you would bid your major.
 
Is that simple and obvious? Is it understandable? Do you need examples?

Reply
Recommend  Message 20 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBartonFinchleySent: 12/10/2008 4:13 AM
I understand, but don't agree.  Say you are 4243   and it went   1c  dbl 2c  If I have a very good hand I don't want to just bid 2S (or 3S).  I want to hear what pard says.
 
This is all premised on the fact that my hand is very good.  In other words "you pick pard" means my hand is so good I think I should become captain. 
 
With worse hands I agree with prior  (worse means a hand that plans on passing pards non jump response.
 
I suppose bidding 3c could fit in here somewhere too  1c  dbl  2c  3c  not sure what that should mean but probably some sort of nt try.

Reply
Recommend  Message 21 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknamePriorKnowledgeSent: 12/10/2008 5:26 AM
So takeout dbler bids 2H... now what do you bid with your 4342? or 4243 or whatever. And if takeout dbler is 3442, do you think takeout dbler will bid 2D to find the 4-4 diam fit?
 
Think about it Joe. Your example makes no sense. 

Reply
Recommend  Message 22 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBartonFinchleySent: 12/10/2008 8:00 AM
I understand and  agree completely you make the bids as you suggest when weak.
 
Your hand is fully strong enough to handle any "bad answers from pard.  Ypi might get lucky and get a diamond or spd response
 
1c   dbl    2c    2bl
2h     p    2S
 
This would show a good jand with 4S and less than 4H
 
I see know reason why:
 
1c   dbl    2c    2bl
2x     p     p
 
Say I have ture crappolla but tolerance for any suit and feel it's more likely we will get to the right place in your best suit,  pard.   I could easily be 3422   and bid hearts and get passed when paed is 4342 and the spd moysian is better..
 

Reply
Recommend  Message 23 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknamevlastik_Sent: 12/10/2008 10:38 AM
Quite nice problem from OP.

I would love to agree with partner to use 1D Db 2C Db as hand showing both majors, as vs. SAYC i could bid Diamonds naturally:

1D Db 2C 2D with xx,xx,QJ10xxx,Kxx.

Cheers, Vlastimil



Reply
Recommend  Message 24 of 24 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknamenbraun0411Sent: 12/10/2008 2:25 PM
I would be playing that the double in that sequence was for penalty:
 
1D X 2C X
 
 

First  Previous  10-24 of 24  Next  Last 
Return to All Message Boards