MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
ALL MY TUDORS...history chat[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  ♦Greetings!  
  ♦Bits & Pieces  
  ♦Death & Burial  
  ♦Brasses & Monuments  
  Read this BEFORE you apply for membership!  
  ♦Group Guidelines  
  ♦To the Boards  
  ♦Message Board  
  
  General  
  
  The Dark Ages  
  
  The Normans  
  
  The Plantagenets  
  
  The Tudors  
  
  The Stuarts  
  
  Mysteries  
  
  Book Talk  
  
  Tudor Topics  
  
  Crusades  
  
  RBOR  
  
  WOTR  
  
  Right Royal Xmas  
  
  Royal Holidays  
  
  Misc Pages  
  ♦AMT Member Map  
  ♦AMT Member List  
  ♦This Week in History  
  ♦Castle of the Day  
  ♦AMT Goes to the Movies  
  ♦Lovely Links  
  ♦Brilliant Books  
  ♦Royal Begats  
  ♦The Royal Book of Records  
  ♦The Crusades  
  ♦The Wars of the Roses  
  ♦Six Wives  
  ♦Off With Her Head  
  ♦The Reformation in England  
  ♦The Tudors and the Tower  
  ♫Tudor Music  
  ♦Tudor Limericks  
  ♦Elizabethan Insults  
  ♦Elizabethan Dressing  
  ♦Elizabethan Makeup  
  ♦The Invincible Armada  
  ♦The Great Fire of London  
    
  Pictures  
  Manager Tools  
  
  
  Tools  
 
Mysteries : Drake in California 1579
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 4 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameMarkGB5  (Original Message)Sent: 3/31/2005 6:27 PM
Does anyone know about the metal plate discovered on a California beach in 1936 ? It was inscribed with a message and dated 17 June 1579 and is supposedly the plate erected by Francis Drake claiming the land for England. I've always thought it was genuine, but I've heard that it's been shown to be a fake. It was certainly regarded as genuine up until the 1970s. 


First  Previous  2-4 of 4  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 2 of 4 in Discussion 
From: GreensleevesSent: 5/7/2005 10:09 AM
All I could find out about it is that the zinc content on the brass was more indicative of post-1800s, not the 1500s, & that the edges seemed on close inspection to be machine-cut & then hammered in an attempt to disguise it.  Some bored historian went to a lot of trouble here to make a very clever forgery LOL  Apparently they got it on display at UC Berkeley still, though.

Reply
 Message 3 of 4 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameMarkGB5Sent: 5/8/2005 11:04 AM
My illusions are shattered. At least the one found in Australia dating from 1616 claiming the land for the Dutch is genuine, isn't it ?

Reply
 Message 4 of 4 in Discussion 
From: ForeverAmberSent: 5/11/2005 11:04 PM
I can't think about Australia without LMAO @ Abel Tasman missing it ROFL....he found tiny Tasmania but couldn't see big Australia HA HA HA
 
Yup...not being helpful here in the least LOL

First  Previous  2-4 of 4  Next  Last 
Return to Mysteries