MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
Odd PeopleDeemed especially "cool" by MSN.[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Odd People  
  Happy Odd Halloween!  
  Happy Odd Mothers' Day!  
  Happy Valentine's Day!  
  Happy Canada Day!  
  Happy Independence Day!  
  Hoppy Easter!  
  Merry Odd Christmas!  
  9-11 Remembrance  
  3701 Members  
  The Litterbox  
  All Topics  
  General  
  Ask Ubergato  
  Odd Tutorials  
  Odd Recipes  
  Odd Captions  
  Odd Games  
  Member Photos 2  
  Member Photos  
  Member Pets  
  Pictures  
  Numbers  
  Birthday Cakes  
  Odderata  
  Documents  
  Happy Hot Dog  
  Member Links  
  Try These  
  Odd Movies  
  Books  
  Music  
  Humor Links  
  Original Humor  
  At The Movies  
  Hillbilly Rap  
  Ubergatos Humor  
  Bubbles Page  
  eViL pOp TaRt's Page  
  DoodleDanD  
  HappyGuppyPuppy  
  HGP freeware picks  
  Tribble's Page  
  Odd Birthdays  
  Ubie's Stuff  
  A  
  Awards Page  
  Odd Lynx  
  Hot Links  
  Cold Links  
  Odd Stationery  
  Holiday Stationery  
  Sootsy's Stuff  
  Kudzu News  
  Ubergatos Adages  
  Billboard Wisdom  
  The Early Bird  
  Cant Eat One  
  At The Movies  
  Odd Peoples' Anniversaries and Other Things  
  
  
  Tools  
 
General : The Tax on Bovine Flatuses
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
Recommend  Message 1 of 9 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameBig_Sky_Heidi  (Original Message)Sent: 12/8/2008 3:52 PM
Recently, the Environment Protection Agency identified animal flatuses as being a significant source of pollutants: approximately 18% of the global warming gases worldwide, including a staggering 37% of methane emissions and an enormous amount of nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide emissions.. After all, there are 1.5 billion cattle and 1.7 billion sheep worldwide to generate all of these scents! That governmental agency, like other government agencies tend to do, saw this as a main chance to levy another tax, using the provisions of the Clean Air Act.

So, we may someday see the taxation of cow farts. Yes, this will take care of those global warming gases. we’ll tax ‘em, and I’m sure the government will spend the money wisely afterwards, as it always does.

But, isn’t this short-sighted? After all, about 70% of the world’s surface is grazing land, and most of this is not yet in places taxable by the EPA. So, this tax will have a limited effect on the total global warming gas emissions unless we also incorporate a series of military adventures to spread the Tax Love around.

There’s another problem: whenever a government derives large amounts of tax money from any source, including from taxing substances which are not healthy for us, the government (in a sense) acquires a vested interest in maintaining that activity or product and thus keeping up the revenue stream. Take cigarette smoking and alcohol beverage drinking: these are significant sources of revenue for both federal and state governmental entities. If the smokers or the boozers were abruptly to smoke less or drink less due to costly taxation, then government would have to get its revenue elsewhere! That can be a serious concern for some people whose bacon might be now fried. And, specifically, our government would have a vested interest in the maintenance of cow fart emissions! I can envision the federal government some day encouraging the development of Crude Cows, those that emit even more cow farts than usual, all the better to tax them more heavily.

There is another concern we should take into account. This proposed tax stereotypes all Bovine Americans as coarse, unmannerly animals. But what about the well-bred cows of America? I can imagine the bovine members of the Junior League thinking the very possibility of a their passing a flatus with utter horror, certain to banish the her from beyond the pale of polite society and being disowned by her family! No, I think we should categorically exclude all Montana cows, which are quite polite and well-bred.

Therefore, I propose that these global warming gases from two alternative sources be taxes in lieu of cows: from teenaged boys, and from politicians! I’m sure that once those sources are curbed, then the global warming problem will be solved!


First  Previous  2-9 of 9  Next  Last 
Reply
Recommend  Message 2 of 9 in Discussion 
From: bewilderedSent: 12/8/2008 4:53 PM
I agree.  This is too much making ado about nothing.  How is this tax going to be listed?  Can you imagine people being hauled to jail for not paying their cow fart taxes?

Reply
Recommend  Message 3 of 9 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameNematodeGirl1Sent: 12/8/2008 6:26 PM
I like the idea of the tax: instant wealth for Okilahoma!

Reply
Recommend  Message 4 of 9 in Discussion 
From: eViL pOp TaRtSent: 12/8/2008 8:46 PM
I love this irony you used -- thewhole concept of taxing cow flatuses is funny, and you took it to the next step!  Thank you for the great laugh!

Reply
Recommend  Message 5 of 9 in Discussion 
From: Chili Dog CharlieSent: 12/9/2008 1:31 AM
Spread the Tax Love?  I love the irony here. 
 
/I occasionally let one fly, myself!

Reply
Recommend  Message 6 of 9 in Discussion 
From: Belle Dame Sans TetonsSent: 12/9/2008 3:03 AM
Cows are real producers.  If we could bottle it, and use it as an alternative fuel, we'd be able to travel on cattle poots!

Reply
Recommend  Message 7 of 9 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameChiliDogEcho1Sent: 12/9/2008 8:47 PM
Our Tennessee cows are well-mannered.
 
Bularian cows poot in Cyrillic.

Reply
Recommend  Message 8 of 9 in Discussion 
From: JulietteSent: 12/11/2008 3:26 AM
Our cows prout in French.

Reply
Recommend  Message 9 of 9 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameUnextendedSubstanceSent: 12/13/2008 4:33 PM
Heidi, following your line of reasoning, any fine, in order to serve as a reliable source of income for a governing body, must be reasonable so as not to totally discourage the deeds the fine is intended to punish.  A paradox, and not a pair of ducks.

First  Previous  2-9 of 9  Next  Last 
Return to General