MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
Heritics of Heroin[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  Welcome  
  Heritics of Heroin Mandate  
  Message Board  
  Junkie Jargon  
  PoliticalRants  
  Poetic Freedom  
  The Prayer Wall  
  ~Shattered Lives~ A Mother's Story By Karen  
  **In Memory Of Meg**  
  **Information Page**  
  The E.R Overdose Video  
  Medical Info~Q&A  
  Treatments  
  Our Fav Movies~Sounds~Books  
  Odds & Ends  
  The Arcade  
  In The News  
  Links  
  Opiates  
  Pictures  
  Member Profile  
  Document Folder  
  Time Zone Converter  
  
  
  Tools  
 
PoliticalRants : schiavo
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 29 in Discussion 
From: Marco  (Original Message)Sent: 3/20/2005 9:34 PM
Hey all- curious what people think of this whole thing with Terry Schiavo- the woman in Florida who's been in a coma for close to 15 years, whose husband says she would not wanted to live this way and whose parents want to keep her alive.
 
Early last week the courts (again!) ruled that there was no legal basis to keep her alive and on Friday her feeding tube was removed.  Congress first intervened by issuing a subpoena to her because there's a law that says no one can "tamper" with someone under subpoena, although it's very clear she can not testify.  When that failed, Congress held an emergency session and enacted a law to have her feeding tube re-installed while pushing the issue up to the federal court level, although the Supreme Court has said it will NOT hear the case.
 
This troubles me on so many levels.  First, even if I didn't have a written living will, my wife would know far better than anyone else what I wanted and I would hope that whatever she said would be respected.  Second, why is this the government's business at all?  First at the state level, when Jeb Bush intervened.  The courts ruled that he had no say, and that ruling was upheld several times.  Then, somehow it became a federal issue in the last few days.  I just cannot see how the federal gov't can enter into a families life and decide what is right.
 
Senator Frist- who is a dr., said he reviewed a videotape of Ms. Shiavo and it was clear to him that she was not in a vegetative state.  This despite a panel of the most highly respected neurologists in the country, appointed by the state, who determined that she is indeed in a "persistent vegetative state."  Frist is not a neurologist, and no doctor should make a diagnosis based on viewing a videotape- IMO.
 
Again, IMO, this is a private issue that the gov't has inserted itself into to promulgate the conservative agenda.  They have publicly stated that they see this as a way to ensure that the democratic senator from Florida is defeated, because he has said the ruling of the courts should be followed.
 
I do understand the grief and pain of her parents, but I for one would not want to be kept alive in that state.  And I fear a gov't that has not only the will but the power to make these decisions. 
 
Ironic that traditionally the conservatives believe in states rights- or at least so they say.  But when the outcome at the state level isn't in agreement with their ideology, then it's OK to make it a federal issue.  Another example of conservatives changing their fundamental views because of ideology that contradicts their agenda. 
 
It just pisses me off!  I've got another rant today on evolution and the whole deal about teaching it in school with the qualifier that it's only a theory and the use of semantics to shift the entire debate that I'm pissed about today, but will hold off on that at least for a little while
 
Marco


First  Previous  15-29 of 29  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 15 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameEXSent: 3/24/2005 3:47 PM
I sincerely feel sorry for this family,
but I also feel this case is a political ploy to somehow
make the republican party look human.
It really is funny because they have cut help for the disabled
 as well as trying to cut Medicaid& Medicare
Along with vet benefits .
 
It's ironic in a way isn't it.
the party that toots less government
has insinuated into the most personal issues.
 
I think personally, that keeping this woman alive in the condition
 she is in is
MORE
torturous
than anything I have heard of in years.
EX
 
 

Reply
 Message 16 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nickname©ShaSent: 3/25/2005 9:09 PM
I think pulling her off a feeding tube for the second times is a sick fucking game..not one of us knows..nor does anyone else for that matter if indeed she feels or does not feel pain.
 
To pull her on and off is really fucked up.
 
"Look here Terri the powers that be are gonna just leave you over there in the corner for a a day or 6 until you either die of hunger or the courts decide to feed you again." "So sorry about that last time in 2001/3...but you didn't feel fuck all anyway..right?" "I mean that's what the doctors say...and we have so much faith in what they say..so catch ya on the other side."
 
Quote:
"A judge has ordered Terri's death on three occasions, and she went without nutrition for five days in April 2001 before a higher court ordered that feeding be resumed. Three Florida appeal court judges are to rule on her future soon."
End Quote.
Source:
 
We have come nowhere close to understanding the brain..what little we do know about it cannot tell us for sure if there isn't another place we go to when in a vegatative state.
 
Starvation is painful...point final.   
 
There is so much more to this story than we're getting. Had she had access to certain rehabilitative procedures she may have improved..or so say some medical experts..others say no. Whatever the case..this reminds me of a death penalty last resort case..going back and forth..back and forth. Bad enough government has a say in that..get the hell out of private situations.
 
If people love you enough they can find a way to send you on peacfully.
 
I would.
 

Reply
The number of members that recommended this message. 0 recommendations  Message 17 of 29 in Discussion 
Sent: 3/26/2005 7:24 AM
This message has been deleted due to termination of membership.

Reply
 Message 18 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MarcoSent: 3/26/2005 7:44 PM
Hey-  Sha, I respect what you're saying and agree with parts but I've gotta strongly disagree with some of what you said.
 
A vegetative state is different than a coma.  The only part of her brain that is functioning is the most primitive part that controls breathing and heartbeat.  MRIs have shown that the parts of her brain that have to do with consciousness have turned into more or less a liquid.
 
The right wing has managed to find a few drs. who dispute this, but these are quacks.  The panel of nationally-respected neurologists that Jeb Bush appointed came to the unanymous conclusion that she has no consciousness, feels no pain, hunger or thirst.  Even if she did feel hunger or thirst, drs. virtually all agree that it is not a horrible way to die.  One fades into a sort of dream state, then sleep, then death.  But that's beside the point because she has no consciousness.
 
The right wing is confusing FACTS by bringing in drs. who have their own agenda to contradict medical science as accepted by virtually all medical authorities.
 
I wish I could find a link to one of the neurologists who was on Bush's panel- he explained it so well and left no doubt as to the facts of the situation.  If I can find a link, I'll paste it.
 
In any case, I do agree with your main conclusion- it should be her husband's right to carry out her wishes.  And court after court has decided that she did in fact tell him on three separate occasions that she never wanted to live if something like this were to happen. (How come all of the sudden the sanctity of marriage, which was so very important to the right wing when it came to gay marriage) now doesn't matter at all and the courts should over-rule marriage.  And if not, the judicial branch, which the right wing says is too activist, needs to be over-ruled by the legislative branch. 
 
The contradictions are just mind-boggling.  I do agree Sha, that this is such a tragedy for all family members- husband, father, mother, brothers.  There is no good outcome.  But we can't let the gov't make decisions about such private matters. 
 
It was good to read in this mornings paper that nearly 80 percent of people felt the federal gov't has no right to intefere in this.  First reassuring thing I've read about the American public in a long time.... 
 
Marco

Reply
 Message 19 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknamewild_under_scoreSent: 3/27/2005 4:44 AM
Let me point out that Jeb does not listen. Did he listen to the panel?
Not really, he went on to search for a neurologist that would state that
she was not necessarily in a persistent vegetative state. Why am I
pointing this out? Call it my agenda but this is a man who is
determined that he is right about everything so don't bother to
contradict him When it's his turn to run for president I hope the
voters have a least a clue as to how dangerous he can be.

>
> *schiavo*
> <http://groups.msn.com/HeriticsofHeroin/_notifications.msnw?type=msg&action=showdiscussion&parent=18&item=25551>
>
> *Reply*
> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=Re%3A%20schiavo>
>
> *Recommend*
> <http://groups.msn.com/HeriticsofHeroin/_notifications.msnw?type=msg&action=recommend&parent=18&item=25742>
> Message 18 in Discussion
>
> From: Marco
> <http://groups.msn.com/HeriticsofHeroin/profile?user=Marco>
>
> The right wing has managed to find a few drs. who dispute this,
> but these are quacks. The panel of nationally-respected
> neurologists that Jeb Bush appointed came to the unanymous
> conclusion that she has no consciousness, feels no pain, hunger or
> thirst. Even if she did feel hunger or thirst, drs. virtually all
> agree that it is not a horrible way to die. One fades into a sort
> of dream state, then sleep, then death. But that's beside the
> point because she has no consciousness.
>
> The right wing is confusing FACTS by bringing in drs. who have
> their own agenda to contradict medical science as accepted by
> virtually all medical authorities.
>
> I wish I could find a link to one of the neurologists who was on
> Bush's panel- he explained it so well and left no doubt as to the
> facts of the situation. If I can find a link, I'll paste it.
>
>
>
> <http://groups.msn.com/Browse?CatId=98>
>


Reply
 Message 20 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nickname©ShaSent: 3/28/2005 11:13 PM
 And this woman still waits to die some 11 or more days later.  
 
 
It is the manor in which it's being done Marco that isn't right..I don't care what the experts say.

Reply
 Message 21 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameEXSent: 3/29/2005 4:15 AM

Reply
 Message 22 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameJunkYardSa1ntSent: 3/29/2005 7:46 AM
Trade that feeding tube for a morphine drip and put on the Simpsons, and I'll be fine, thank you.

Reply
 Message 23 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nickname©ShaSent: 3/29/2005 1:55 PM
Agreed.

Reply
 Message 24 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MarcoSent: 3/29/2005 7:12 PM
Hey Sha- can you elaborate?  If she's not suffering and everyone who's objective agrees that she's not, why is it a problem?
 
The drs. who have examined her over the last few days say she looks very much at peace.  It reminds me of my dad's final days when he'd made his peace and was ready to go.  While he was not in a vegitative state or a coma, he was in and out of consciousness the last few days and knew the time had come.  He passed very peacefully.
 
The US hospice system is a wonderful thing, and she is at a hospice.  They ensure that patients don't suffer but let them go when it's time to go.  And IMO, that's how it should be.
 
Marco
 
Marco

Reply
 Message 25 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameSuziblues2Sent: 3/30/2005 6:12 AM
I beleive she is on a morphine drip now.  thank God.
sue

Reply
 Message 26 of 29 in Discussion 
From: CurioSent: 3/31/2005 9:51 PM
May she rest in peace.

Reply
 Message 27 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MarcoSent: 3/31/2005 11:28 PM
Agreed, Curio- may she rest in peace and may all of us learn from this horrible experience.  We should all make a pact to make a living will.  I don't care what your personal choice is, just take the action so that our choices are followed.  Those of us who wouldn't want to be alive as Terry was need to protect ourselves and our familes so that we may go in peace when we decide we're ready.
 
If anything at all good comes of this, I hope that more of us will give this some thought and save our loved ones the pain of going through what both Michael Schiavo and Terry parents went through, and of course what Terry herself went through.
 
Rest in peace; what else is there to say?
 
Marco

Reply
 Message 28 of 29 in Discussion 
From: CurioSent: 4/1/2005 5:51 PM
Thanks Marco. I hadn't cried over this until now...your post helped me to reach the emotion I needed to expell...Tears are the Floodgates to the Soul. Peace, my friend

Reply
 Message 29 of 29 in Discussion 
From: MarcoSent: 4/2/2005 9:23 PM
Thank you, Curio.

Marco

First  Previous  15-29 of 29  Next  Last 
Return to PoliticalRants