MSN Home  |  My MSN  |  Hotmail
Sign in to Windows Live ID Web Search:   
go to MSNGroups 
Free Forum Hosting
 
Important Announcement Important Announcement
The MSN Groups service will close in February 2009. You can move your group to Multiply, MSN’s partner for online groups. Learn More
ALL MY TUDORS...history chat[email protected] 
  
What's New
  
  ♦Greetings!  
  ♦Bits & Pieces  
  ♦Death & Burial  
  ♦Brasses & Monuments  
  Read this BEFORE you apply for membership!  
  ♦Group Guidelines  
  ♦To the Boards  
  ♦Message Board  
  
  General  
  
  The Dark Ages  
  
  The Normans  
  
  The Plantagenets  
  
  The Tudors  
  
  The Stuarts  
  
  Mysteries  
  
  Book Talk  
  
  Tudor Topics  
  
  Crusades  
  
  RBOR  
  
  WOTR  
  
  Right Royal Xmas  
  
  Royal Holidays  
  
  Misc Pages  
  ♦AMT Member Map  
  ♦AMT Member List  
  ♦This Week in History  
  ♦Castle of the Day  
  ♦AMT Goes to the Movies  
  ♦Lovely Links  
  ♦Brilliant Books  
  ♦Royal Begats  
  ♦The Royal Book of Records  
  ♦The Crusades  
  ♦The Wars of the Roses  
  ♦Six Wives  
  ♦Off With Her Head  
  ♦The Reformation in England  
  ♦The Tudors and the Tower  
  ♫Tudor Music  
  ♦Tudor Limericks  
  ♦Elizabethan Insults  
  ♦Elizabethan Dressing  
  ♦Elizabethan Makeup  
  ♦The Invincible Armada  
  ♦The Great Fire of London  
    
  Pictures  
  Manager Tools  
  
  
  Tools  
 
Mysteries : ELIZABETH I...THE VIRGIN QUEEN
Choose another message board
 
     
Reply
 Message 1 of 23 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameLadyoftheGlade1  (Original Message)Sent: 6/15/2002 3:15 PM
Was she REALLY a virgin all her life??
 
How well did Robert Dudley really "know" her?
 
What's everyone's opinion here?


First  Previous  9-23 of 23  Next  Last 
Reply
 Message 9 of 23 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameSandPypurSent: 6/26/2002 8:32 AM
I believe there were two very good reasons to declare herself a virgin.  First was the dangers of childbirth.  Elizabeth couldn't afford to risk her life during labor, and she had seen first hand that this was very possible when her step mother Jane Seymour died giving birth to Edward.  If she died in childbirth, and the child died also, Mary Queen of Scots would likely win the crown.  Even if the child survived it would become the pawn of political schemes, and Mary would likely still try to wrestle the crown from the infant.  Whomever Elizabeth married would not hold the title of King nor be allowed to rule given the death of Elizabeth (see the current example of Queen Elizabeth II and her husband Prince Phillip, who is not in the line of succession to the throne).  Childbirth was expected of the wife of a King, but was too dangerous for a Queen who ruled in her own name. 
 
And then there were the political reasons.  There simply wasn't an eligible bachelor who wouldn't tick someone off.  Marry a local noble and piss everyone off, marry a foreign prince and make considerable foreign enemies and local enemies.  I don't think Elizabeth's decision not to marry was product of an aversion to marriage or male companionship.  It simply wasn't safe or wise.
 
With that said, I am also of the opinion that Mary did have discrete relationships- most likely with Dudley and perhaps even with Seymour as she was accused.  Perhaps the pertinent question is why didn't Henry arrange for her to be married before his death?  She was 14 when he died, which meant she had been marriagable for two years already.  If Henry had been looking for a good political ally, promising Elizabeth to someone would have been the best way to gain one.  He didn't expect her to be Queen, but he didn't expect Mary to be either, and he married her to Philip of Spain specifically for the alliance that would bring.  Perhaps he too realized that there were no suitable alliances to be made and that's why he stalled her marriage.
 
Pypur 
 
     

Reply
 Message 10 of 23 in Discussion 
From: double_bladed_ninjaSent: 7/17/2002 2:09 AM
I cant believe none of you have heard this but Elizabeth had a miscarriage by Seymour in 1550

Reply
 Message 11 of 23 in Discussion 
From: RhiannonSent: 7/17/2002 2:25 AM
Where did you get this info? Would love to hear more about this. Is there a book or something you read?
                                     Rhiannon 

Reply
 Message 12 of 23 in Discussion 
From: AnnieBmeSent: 7/17/2002 3:07 AM
I know about the "daliances" between Elizabeth and Seymour and the "tickleing" sessions which it is said that even Catherine Parr joined in on, but while there were many "stories" and rumors about Elizabeth and Seymour I have never come accross any believeable source which states of a miscarriage.
 
I think I remember about a rumor of an alleged miscarriage which was told to discredit Elizabeth and alienate her from her sister Mary.  From Henry VIII's death to the time Elizabeth gained the thrown, there was SOOOOO many rumors, "whisperings", "stories", etc.on ALL sides of the political fences, depending on which agenda was trying to be put forth.
 
As Elizabeth scratched onto the window (or was it the wall?) of her tower cell, when Mary had had her imprisioned there..."Much suspected of me...Yet, nothing can be proved."

Reply
 Message 13 of 23 in Discussion 
From: double_bladed_ninjaSent: 7/17/2002 2:06 PM
Yes all it is is an assumption of Alison Weir but at the time of Seymour's beheading she was suffering from severe headaches and stomach aches and never came to court. Some say, including Alison that it was her grief of a miscarriage she had by Seymour. Then again it is only her idea. Perhaps it was the grief of Seymour's death which she had to adequately hide in fron of her councillors in fear of their suspicion of her.

Reply
 Message 14 of 23 in Discussion 
From: GreensleevesSent: 7/17/2002 10:01 PM
Greetings, one and all!  Annie, I believe the quote goes: "Much suspected of me, Nothing proven shall be, Quoth Elizabeth, prisoner".  Ninja, I have read all of Alison Weir books and I remember that passage.....however interesting it may be to speculate that Elizabeth and Seymour consummated their relationship, it is still just Weir's opinion.

Reply
 Message 15 of 23 in Discussion 
From: AnnieBmeSent: 7/18/2002 2:52 AM
THAT"S how it goes!  
(I knew it was not exact, but I gave the gist of it   )
 
Thanks Greensleeves!

Reply
 Message 16 of 23 in Discussion 
From: Anne of ClevesSent: 8/24/2002 8:37 AM
Elizabeth had a VERY precarious hold on the throne... not only did she inherit Henry VII's precarious hold, but she was also declared a bastard.  She would never, from what I read, allow her body to jeopardize her position.  She had enough to worry about with Mary Queen of Scots.
 
I give absolutely no credit to the miscarriage.  If anyone here has lost anyone close to them, it does indeed take a toll on a person in every way possible... including physically.  Thomas Seymour's death had to have been hard on the girl.
 
Elizabeth had too much to lose.  She was also constantly surrounded by friends and enemies... she was never able to tell sometimes who was her friend and who was her enemy.
 
And remember how she felt about children: "Princes can never love the child who is to succeed them".... she knew if she were to have a son, she would be overthrown, and a regency would be set up against her in his name, a la Mary Queen of Scots.
 
She knew marrying an Englishman would cause civil unrest, even war.  Marrying a foreign prince, she only had to look at what happened to her sister.  Plus, look at what happened to her stepmothers, and the Queen before her mother... if she married a King or a Prince like her father... she could have been banished, beheaded, or annulled, and her position was not one that would tolerate such treatment.  And the bearing of children could be deadly.
 
Elizabeth loved her people, and position, too much to risk losing it, I think.  She DEFINITELY had to go to third base at least... and there *are* ways of being satisfied without going all the way.
 
Elizabeth knew what she was doing.  She knew how much was at stake, and I think she was VERY careful to live up to her image as "Virgin Queen"

Reply
 Message 17 of 23 in Discussion 
From: EchoSent: 8/25/2002 6:15 AM
I guess Elizabeth I was "queen of her own domain"?    Sorry, I couldn't resist!

Reply
 Message 18 of 23 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameVioletMNashCVTSent: 2/7/2005 7:55 AM
I know it's been quite some time since this thread was last discussed, but the part about Alison Weir making the claim that Elizabeth miscarried Seymour's baby peaked my interest.  I didn't remember ever reading Weir saying that, so I tried to find the passage that's being referenced.  I found two possibilities in "Children of Henry VIII".   The first is from the chapter Amorous Intrigues.  She states that her illness that summer (when Parr was still pregnant and Seymour still alive) was probably a nervous breakdown and that some thought it could have been a miscarriage, but there isn't enough evidence to state the theory as fact.  The second passage is from the chapter A Royal Scandal, shortly after Seymour was killed.  It states that there was a story of a midwife being brought blindfolded to a mansion where she delivered a baby of a 'fair young lady'.  The child was destroyed.  She states that many believed it was Elizabeth, but there isn't any evidence to support it, and the midwife wasn't even sure who the girl was.  If these weren't the passages being referenced, I apoligize then for bringing up such old news , but it just didn't seem right that Weir had said Elizabeth had had a miscarriage. 
I agree that Elizabeth probably did have some sort of sexual relationship with Dudley, though never actual sex.  At least as much of one as she could have being so much in the public eye and surrounded by her ladies and coutiers every day.   
Violet

Reply
 Message 19 of 23 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameLegendaryLisette7Sent: 2/11/2005 7:38 AM
Hello everyone,

Robert Dudley married Amy Robsart, not Lettice Knollys. When Amy died - she was found dead at the bottom of the staircase at their house - it was in the middle of Robert and Elizabeth's love affair and caused a great scandal. It prevented any question of marriage because there was suspicion that Amy was murdered.

I think that it would have been very difficult for Robert and Elizabeth to actually have sex, but being a romantic I hope that they did! I don't like to think of her dying a virgin! Anyway, it was certainly a great love affair and I think that they loved each other all their lives.

Reply
 Message 20 of 23 in Discussion 
From: ForeverAmberSent: 2/11/2005 10:00 PM
Dudley's SECOND wife was Lettice Knollys, granddaughter of Mary Boleyn, daughter of Catherine Carey & Francis Knollys; they had one son who died very young.  Lettice was said to be a younger, fresher version of Elizabeth....hmmm....think Dudley settled?

Reply
 Message 21 of 23 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknameredfire8156Sent: 2/12/2005 2:16 PM
I think Robert Dudley and her were more than just good chums. I don't know for sure or not but Hollywood certainly portrays him as being her lover, not that that is what I am basing my oppinion on of course *grin*

Reply
 Message 22 of 23 in Discussion 
From: MSN NicknameLegendaryLisette7Sent: 2/13/2005 3:43 AM
Hello Forever Amber,

Yes, I didn't realise that. Sorry! I feel very sorry for Robert because he couldn't marry his true love and had to have a 'substitue'! Then again it is possible to love two women at the same time so he probably loved Laetitia as well - just not as much!

Reply
 Message 23 of 23 in Discussion 
From: MSN Nicknamelori_451Sent: 2/14/2005 3:08 AM
I don't believe she was really a virgin..I believe she watched her fathers wives lose their heads .. and create new religions to cast aside a wife etc..and she was afraid to give that much control to a man.. I think she had lovers ..but just my opinion..:)

First  Previous  9-23 of 23  Next  Last 
Return to Mysteries