It is my personal view that when handling feminiists one should not intrude upon their space or be very careful in the process.

 

I consider myself similar to Irwin with the way I treat liberals. I like to prod them and watch their reactions.  Sometimes I get bit but the venom hasn't killed me yet.

 

Instead I have formed sort of an immunization for it as well as an insensitivity to the bites. My emotions have become like leather.  Is there bile in my speech also?

 

I considered Steve Irwin an animal lover.  I even get my cat disturbed on purpose and violate his space. I sometimes verbally talk about other cats being smarter than him but I don't think he understands.  I still wouldn't give him up for anything in the world.

 

The civil rights movement, using politics to accomplish its goal, has created an economy that has brought the middle class down to the same level as the poor of the sixties.  It now takes everyone in the family working just to make ends meet.  Those liberals of the sixties, the hippies, are now in power in the guise of neo-conservatism and all those free-love types who believe in equality are now charging me more and more out of my paycheck each week to replace the monies that our government spends using credit while shopping in the international market place and the government does not even pay back the interest on the loans.

 

Fellini tried to figure out the liberal woman and fantasized about having a harem of women but in the end wound up confused about his own sexuality.  This is a just recompense of reward for attempting to relate to a feminist or even groups of them.  He had become what he hated and loved and Steve Irwin was not the most articulate of men but he was a decent guy.  I think he loved those animals and Fellini loved(obsessed) over the liberal animal also.  Both took into themselves a little bit of what they loved(Fellini, a little bit too much).

 

Hating liberalism can get one into trouble.  One has to love the liberal and not hate the belief systems of that individual through anger.  Liberal women don't want to realize that their empowerment comes through dependency and not choice at all.

 

The woman of old was owned by her husband under law and now the government owns not only her but her family and her choices.  Women are the oppressors in a wicked nation and the children rule over them.  They have their just recompense of reward.  There is nothing feminine about a liberal, feminist activist.

 

Just as John Walsh, a left-wing nutcase, hides behind his dead son and plays the role of victim for his agenda to destroy our right to own guns, the Jersey women want us to sympathize with the death of their husbands on 911 so they can continue to use our sympathy to further their cause.

 

John Walsh gets no sympathy from this libertarian and neither do the Jersey women.  Ann Coulter was too soft with them.  However Walsh gets away with more because his left-wing approach can be a little harder to resist when the picture of a little boy is in the mind of the beholder while the anti-gun advocates pick your pocket and remove the protection from our homes in the guise of protecting children.

 

We need to protect our children from the policies of John Walsh and the Jersey girls.