Maybe because very, very few parents of either sex murder their children. Only a very small percent of the prison population is there for that reason.
Maybe more American men are accused of rape because we are a much more violent society, and therefore there IS more rape.
Rape has been redefined so many times that it has become ridiculous. The sodomites and lesbians view straight sex with a post-pubescent woman and an older man as pedophilia and rape. We need to define our words properly instead of using generalities. Under God's law, if a woman does not scream in the city she is guilty also.
I'm not a feminist by any means, but your arguments are ridiculous
Maybe many people murder their children and this does not exclude abortion if one considers the children of partial birth abortion. It does not take a rocket scientist to realize that whether the child is murdered during birth or while the birth is taking place or for that matter during the pregnancy itself(since men can be charged for murder for two if one shoots a pregnant woman and kills the baby inside) it does not matter. It is Murder.
The pro murder of child liberals are like the pedophiles. A pedophile having sex with a prepubescent young girl can blame the girl for the clothes causing him to rape the young girl. He just cannot face his own proclivities to have sex with prepubescent females or males(children). That is child abuse.
Ephebophilia is not child abuse however but the liberals have to condone gay ephebophilia while condemning opposite sex ephebophilia because it does not fit their agenda of control. Therefore laws are created that enable the wickedness of homosexuality and stifle the natural function of a postpubescent female and/or an older male in order to carry out the natural acts of procreation.
Of course statistics can be manipulated but that does not mean there is not substance to the statistics. Anyone can watch how easily older women get less time for having sex with young boys and even their students. This is happening a lot.
Summer of '42 is promoted as a woman who loses her husband and thus the novel justifies the sex between her and the fourteen year old. I have never heard the woman ( whose husband was killed and this was the causal factor for her depression)called a monster.
However both Humbert Humbert and the woman of the Summer of '42 both were traumatized by death yet the woman is held as justified in her reactions but Humbert is considered a monster. Both had sex with post-pubescent individuals. Everyone can see that the two stories are presented with a bias.
Any family with more than one head and two wills will be a disaster as a family unit. Pretty soon one head might think its opinion will rule and then one might wind up murdering the other.
This is why the biblical law of adultery(woman that breaketh wedlock - Ezekiel 16:32) was implemented by God. Adultery was a very serious thing(which is woman that breaketh wedlock). Men did not commit adultery if an extra wife was given to him by God. This biblical monogamy thing was implemented by Rome.
We are to obey the ordinances of man as long as they are not used to create double standards. Today we have double standards and no fault divorce thus doing away with the Christian code of the law of God which protects the family unit.
The word "abuse" is slung around by liberal women as if it was fact. They consider corporal punishment of children abusive which is derived from the words "abnormal" and "use" when in reality physical correction is normal.
These same sensitivity types that want only the liberal warmed-over pabulum of truth to be accepted now are promoting anal sodomy and homosexuality as normal instead of abnormal use of the human body or perversion.
That book that the Deists put beside that lamp clearly states that homosexuality is an abomination and that the natural use is turned to perversion and therefore God judges it. God never judges polygyny, nor does He judge an older man having sex with a younger post-pubescent female. All these secular laws are hogwash and transfer control of the father's children(that is also biblical) over to the servant(the wife) and away from the master, the husband. This is why the liberals so hate the bible and especially the fact that the bible says that the woman must be subservient to her husband according to the dictates of the law of God and the will of God.
The Deists obviously need a brighter light bulb because the bible is very clear on this. I know the writings that were in the links provided say that we should not treat our wives as servants alone but to love them and be gentle with a right spirit. Masters treated their slaves with a right spirit or a wrong spirit but slaves were still slaves and the slaves won the masters over to God by their good behavior, not running off and getting a no fault divorce from the master.
Remember the master had many slaves but the servant had only one master in the bible. Christ is the Master of His bride, the church and He makes the decisions. We are His servants. He is not the poolboy who dances while Dixie Wetsworth pipes her song for him to dance to.
Not only is Christ the Son of God in His humanity but in Spirit He was before Abraham. A Deist can become a politician because a Deist can get away with promoting all religions as equal but a Christian can never be a politician because he can never promote another religion above Jesus Christ. This is the difference between the two.
A Deist can be a hypocrite with his bible next to his lantern and get away with creating laws that go against the law of God and the words of Christ because reading the bible is one thing but believing it and exalting the law of God will get one kicked out of politics rapidly.
It is true that the love of God supercedes hell being hung over our heads in order to procure submission by God or the husband but that does not negate the fact of the order of God. The goodness of God leads to repentance but the severity of God is still there. All one needs to do in order not to be saved is not to believe or reject the Name of Jesus. There are many Deist institutions that reject the fact that Jesus is God.
Statistics can be manipulated but objective viewing of life in general shows the killing of the unborn by women and even the partially born being murdered for nothing more than anger towards a husband or boyfriend or even mere convenience.
I will not sit idly by and let liberals pull the wool over my eyes. You know why the liberals call the Republican party the gay party now? They are mocking. In actuality all that mess has come into the Republican party and it is bringing it down, just as it is bringing our nation down as a whole.
Instead of it being a sodomy issue of man on man(ephebophilia) sex solicitation, the liberals have turned this issue of Foley into a pedophile scam. There is no pedophilia here or authority problem(of employer-employee) or Clinton would be in jail for sex in the Oral Office. This man was of the age of consent(DC) as was Monica but if the gay issue is brought about as a problem, both parties will be viewed as hypocrites.
You must remember that empowerment of the left is dependent, not only upon the government, but the government's support of the weak(women and homosexuals). This is why Eve was deceived and not Adam. She thought she could depend upon another tree other than Christ and that tree of the knowledge of Good and Evil is now secular government for her.
She disobeyed her own husband and fornicated with the tree of Hagar or the tree of the law of man. She empowered herself and lost all of authority at the same time and gave up being a true woman just as femininsts give up being feminine to become the very thing that they secretly hate(men or male authority). The product of this hate is lesbianism, a just recompense of reward.
Have you ever noticed how the Deists never mention the fact that our children are not biblically part of a woman's body(whether in them or out of them) but that the bible teaches that it is the father who is the owner or master of the offspring? Why do you think fathers could accept a bride price for the daughter? The mother was not given the money. It was Christ that paid the price for His bride and not the church.
The Deists are a very confused lot when it comes to this issue of the bible or else they have given up these truths to maintain the agenda of the politician. Can a libertarian enter politics and become dishonest as a Republican or a Democrat while having his lamp and his bible right next to him? These zealots at the funerals of the military speaking against homosexuality have more truth than half of the politicans today. Their timing may be wrong but truth is still truth.
These Amish have more forgiveness in their little fingers than our legalists in government. John Walsh is so bitter over the loss of his son that his vengeance has caused him to move to the left and embrace removing our 2nd Amendment rights. He is becoming a female on the inside, embracing the government to protect the goats that the government has claimed as their children, rather than the children of God. We need our guns to protect our children from Walsh and the fledgling goats that work for the government bureaucracy who think they own our children. And some think I am radical?
These are merely biblical truths. Sucking up to the law of man in order to appease the guilt in one's conscience because of killing the unborn and the born does not alleviate the law of God. You have a lamp and a bible, read what it says. Get out that Greek and Hebrew and see that the husband is the head of the wife, as Christ is the Head of the church and He is the Savior of the body. This is the mystery.
Let every man have his own(heautou) wife and let every woman have her own(idios) husband. I will not do the work. Look up idios and heautou and see the difference.
Men are different than women. Colonels are different than privates in the church militant. The church is not an army of one and neither should our military be that.