Here we go..... Many assume that APOSTASION/divorced or writ and APOLUO are synonyms. Document your proof or otherwise don't make statements that you can't prove. The Bible even proves them wrong using the KJV because the Bible says: Thus saith the Lord: Where is the bill of your mother's divorcement(KERIYTHUWTH), whom I have put away(SHALACH)? Or which of my creditors is it to whom I have sold you? Behold, for your iniquities have ye sold yourselves, and for your transgressions is your mother put away(SHALACH). Isaiah 50:1  The Bible even teaches in Isaiah 50:1 in the Hebrew that divorced and the putting away are totally different words and definitions. What are you going to say? The KJV lies? No way!
 A putting away will never be Sin-............onymous with a completed writ of divorcement.
The synonym in the Hebrew that is put away is SHALACH. In the New Testament, the synonym for SHALACH or the putting away is APOLUO. The synonym in the Hebrew for divorced is KERIYTHUWTH. In the New Testament, the synonym for KERIYTHUWTH(divorced) is APOSTASION in Greek. NO ONE can MAKE a synonym out of APOSTASION and APOLUO or PUT AWAY and DIVORCED. It won't work. No matter what language you used. Same in the Hebrew. Not one person can make synonyms out of SHALACH(put away) and KERIYTHUWTH(divorced) . other ... But being used of divorce and being divorced with a writ is as the difference between night and day. One is legally married when put away or used of divorceAPOLUO but one is loosed from the responsibilities of marriage and the bond is dissolved when one is APOSTASION or divorced. A divorce process is not a divorce writ or complete divorce-ment. Even in natural law today, one can commit adultery during the separation period or the putting away...... but not after the finalization or writ is received. The reason for this is while one is separated or in a partial divorce(sending away) that mate is still married legally. That is called the putting away. The writ dissolves the bond and one is loosed from the law with a writ. Even when God divorced His one wife, He gave her a writ AND a putting away. Both are required and the writ is a command from God to legitimize the divorce. The writ is commanded in Deuteronomy 24:1-4(Moses commanded to give a writ of divorcement, AND to put her away - Matthew 19:7) Jesus did what He taught with Israel. And I saw, when for all the causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery I had put her away, AND given her a bill of divorce(KERIYTHUWTH) .....Jeremiah 3:8 Do you think you can slide by and call a writ a putting away when God did both to get His divorcement legitimately. Are we smarter than He at his own law? He knew that only putting Israel away was treating her treacherously without a bill of divorcement. That is what the Pharisees were doing when they were arguing with Jesus. They were putting their wives away for any cause and not giving them a writ and the wives were still committing adultery in the street because they were still married legally and under the law they had to be stoned. But Jesus straightened the Pharisees out and He would straighten the legalists out today also by commanding them to give a writ and not just put away. Even today in Israel, it is necessary to have a writ of divorce for divorce to be complete. However, many are still put away and not divorced. The problem is still there. "While in most cases Judaism's tolerant acceptance of divorce enables a decent split, in too many situations this male prerogative becomes the means for extortion, vengeance and affliction--certainly not a biblical ideal. Thus, although her consent to the divorce is necessary, the woman is still at the mercy of the man. (This shows that women cannot divorce the men in Israel) In the course of the development of Jewish law, many improvements have been incorporated into the system in an attempt to limit the man's unilateral power and prevent the misery. The rabbis were aware of and sensitive to women's vulnerability. But....A Jewish divorce requires a get, a document that a man freely gives to his wife and she must voluntarily accept. Without this document neither partner may remarry according to Jewish law. Today, this affects Conservative, Orthodox and all Israeli Jews. The Reform movement often relies on local civil divorce courts and the Conservative movement has empowered its central court to intervene and act unilaterally to effect a divorce when there are insurmountable problems. But throughout Israel and in the Orthodox community outside of Israel, the pattern of insisting on the biblical directive has left too many women agunot. An agunah is a woman who cannot remarry because her husband is unable or unwilling to give her a get. The term literally means "anchored" or "tied down" and if first founnd in verb form in the biblical story of Ruth(1:13). The original talmudic use of the word was limited to cases in which the man had disappeared and literally could not act as a legal instrument in the Jewish divorce proceedings. Recently, popular usage has expanded the term to apply to all cases of women who are unable to remarry because their husbands will not acquiesce and give the divorce document." From "Jewish Women in Chains" Even today, women are in chains because of the hardness of man's heart. Men are still dealing treacherously with women even today and putting them away APOLUO and leaving them in limbo to commit adultery......without a writ of complete Divorcement. DO YOU think that the Jews are lying in the article above because they state that this is still going on and that putting away without a WRIT is dealing with them in a treacherous manner? If being divorced is the same as being put away, what are all these Jewish ladies concerned about??? It is the same in our culture. WOMEN TODAY are STILL left in a ste of vulnerability by being given a partial divorce or a putting away and are being caused to commit adultery through legal manipulation and intimidation. Under law and in the scriptures and historically the putting away is not a complete divorcement. The definitions in the Hebrew for SHALACH DO NOT EVEN MENTION DIVORCE. The scripture say s that God hates the putting away(divorce) SHALACH in Hebrew. If one wants to follow Hebrew instead of Greek to prove a point, look it up and see if SHALACH means divorced or being put away(divorce) and then look up the word(KERIYTHUWTH) in the Hebrew .They are not synonyms in either Greek, Hebrew or English. Divorce is a process. Divorced is a state of being. Put away is neither divorcement nor a writ. Did John and Jane have a sanctified marriage or a biblically unsactified civil one? That is also relevent in the matter at hand. Any comments? |
Free Forum Hosting
Important Announcement
Prev Message
