I posted this on the anti-offender laws group.

---

Mary,

I truly appreciate your link. I notice that the concepts on Judeo-Christianity are compared to "Rome-antic" or Catholic(Roman) tradition.

Biblical law was in effect long before Augustine and his sexual problems date back to the Tree in the Garden or the Fall of man.

Jesus addressed the Pharisees for misusing their wives, in order to keep the dowery. They would divorce their wives or put away their wives and not give them a writ of divorcement under God's law. This way the misuse of divorcement by the males was a way of procuring another wife and keeping the monies for themselves.

They also set the put away wife up(she did not have a writ of divorcement) to commit adultery because she was still legally married to the husband who had sent her out of the house under the law. The law was being misused.

Today, we have the law of the Beast who perverts the law of God and tells us that breaking of the law of God is no big deal. But breaking his laws is a big deal! This is known as the Beastarchy.

Incest is a very serious thing. God's law involves order and not chaos. In order for government officials to be empowered, there needs to be much chaos and family dysfunction.

If families held together, it would disempower the Beast, thus when incest occurs by consent, the Beastarchy turns one into a victim and the other into a perpetrator. This empowers the government structure and feeds monies into the Beast through the masses to pay off the Central Bank loans. You know, those foreign loans! This hidden tax is called registration fees. They are just as unconstitutional as the income tax.

Under God's law, when incest occurred between father and daughter, both were held accountable for the crime and had to take personal responsibility. Under man's law or the law of Baal, division of the family takes place and the children are auctioned off to the highest bidder in the bureaucracy as chattel. The family is destroyed because of man's law. It is designed that way on purpose, not to protect the daughter but to make profit for man and the bureaucracy.

The prison system is big business in the United States. Many have invested into that system and more laws create the image of more crime. This is why the government sees fit to make sure that fathers are removed from the home on a daily basis.

Under God's law, both the father and the daughter were held accountable for the crime of incest. Under man's law, only one party is held accountable. In other words, the world system or the federal government views the daughter as only being able to make personal choices when it fits their own laws. If her choices support the bureaucracy and transfer power to the system, she is praised as a woman for her choices. If her choices support her family or the family members and the family is cohesive and strong, the system views such as disempowerment and dangerous.

Strong families remove the power from the federal government. Our government prison system is big business. Much money is made off of the prison system. Anyone with a brain knows that incarcerating someone for having sex with a post-pubescent young woman in an incestuous relationship does not help the alleged(sometimes pseudo) victim as far as trauma goes. As a matter of fact, I think I could present a case with facts proving that incest is a double trauma for the victim when the world sees all of the victim's personal life out in the open. Who wants their sex lives all over the court system or their past sex faults all over the Internet?

If God's laws were implemented, both parties would be held accountable, with the exception of rape.

The horrible sin that the son committed in I Cor. 5 was not incest itself alone. There was plenty of that to go around in that day. It was the fact that the son was disrespecting the head of the family by having his father's wife(the stepmother). He broke the law of respecting his father. Family order is the main purpose of the prohibition on incest.

David's sin was against Uriah the Hittite and not against Bathsheba, according to I Kings 15:5. Uriah was the head and provider of Bathsheba(the ewe, see II Samuel 12) who was like a daughter to Uriah. She was like a daughter under God's law because full authority was given to Uriah for a wife and a daughter and he was responsible for both, under the law.

Today's laws make a post-pubescent young woman of thirteen or over appear to have no sense at all in her decisions. Sixteen year old ladies today are treated like they are five years old with no capacity to think for themselves or consider consequences for their own actions. What happened to the woman's lib movement where post-pubescent young women owned their own bodies and the state should butt out of their personal business because they are now allegedly independent.

I can remember when post-pubescent young women took responsibility for their actions and the state did not try to interfere in their personal lives from the ages of fourteen until eighteen. They used to hitchhike and travel to San Francisco to become "liberated." No one was protecting them at that time and many are still alive today and much stronger and are much more independent in their thinking than those young ladies of the same age are today. Today's young women play the role of victim and the government supports that role of the false image of naivete. In other words, today's little girls range from thirteen to Monica Lewinsky's age(in the case of Bill Clinton). They are just used and those authority figures are using them.

We know that Monica was like a little girl seduced by big powerful Bill. She could not possibly turn down his advances because she was in a position of weakness and she was in her emotions(cough). Could it be that she was ambitious and wanting power and attention? Could it be that Monica was not stupid and most young ladies are not stupid and can actually think for themselves? It is possible that these laws are created and these registries created to make big monies for the fascist state in order to pay off those foreign loans that they have run up by violating the

sovereignty of other nations?

Now we have a fifteen year old doing oral sex on seventeen year olds and only one of them is getting done in, under man's laws, when both should be held accountable. Women today are in bondage to the law until they are eighteen, much more than the post-pubescent young women of yesterday. I thought women wanted to be liberated and in the sixties, they tried to remove all those opposing laws.

These same hypocrites remain silent today as twelve year old offenders get on the sex registry by having sex with a thirteen year old. Where are all these liberal loud-mouths of the sixties today? Instead of getting rid of bureaucracy, they are expanding laws and doing the opposite of what they pretended to be in the sixties. It is all about power and money and fascism.

Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely!

Fred