|
|
Reply
| |
The Plan to Replace the Dollar With the 'Amero' Jerome R. Corsi - Human Events Online || May 25, 2006 The idea to form the North American Union as a super-NAFTA knitting together Canada, the United States and Mexico into a super-regional political and economic entity was a key agreement resulting from the March 2005 meeting held at Baylor University in Waco, Tex., between President Bush, President Fox and Prime Minister Martin.
A joint statement published by the three presidents following their Baylor University summit announced the formation of an initial entity called, “The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America�?(SPP). The joint statement termed the SPP a “trilateral partnership�?that was aimed at producing a North American security plan as well as providing free market movement of people, capital, and trade across the borders between the three NAFTA partners:
We will establish a common approach to security to protect North America from external threats, prevent and respond to threats within North America, and further streamline the secure and efficient movement of legitimate, low-risk traffic across our borders.
A working agenda was established:
We will establish working parties led by our ministers and secretaries that will consult with stakeholders in our respective countries. These working parties will respond to the priorities of our people and our businesses, and will set specific, measurable, and achievable goals.
The U.S. Department of Commerce has produced a SPP website, which documents how the U.S. has implemented the SPP directive into an extensive working agenda.
Following the March 2005 meeting in Waco, Tex., the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) published in May 2005 a task force report titled “Building a North American Community.�?We have already documented that this CFR task force report calls for a plan to create by 2010 a redefinition of boundaries such that the primary immigration control will be around the three countries of the North American Union, not between the three countries. We have argued that a likely reason President Bush has not secured our border with Mexico is that the administration is pushing for the establishment of the North American Union.
Article Posted at www.KnowledgeDrivenRevolution.com
The North American Union is envisioned to create a super-regional political authority that could override the sovereignty of the United States on immigration policy and trade issues. In his June 2005 testimony to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Robert Pastor, the Director of the Center for North American Studies at American University, stated clearly the view that the North American Union would need a super-regional governance board to make sure the United States does not dominate the proposed North American Union once it is formed:
NAFTA has failed to create a partnership because North American governments have not changed the way they deal with one another. Dual bilateralism, driven by U.S. power, continue to govern and irritate. Adding a third party to bilateral disputes vastly increases the chance that rules, not power, will resolve problems.
This trilateral approach should be institutionalized in a new North American Advisory Council. Unlike the sprawling and intrusive European Commission, the Commission or Council should be lean, independent, and advisory, composed of 15 distinguished individuals, 5 from each nation. Its principal purpose should be to prepare a North American agenda for leaders to consider at biannual summits and to monitor the implementation of the resulting agreements.
Pastor was a vice chairman of the CFR task force that produced the report “Building a North American Union.�?
Pastor also proposed the creation of a Permanent Tribunal on Trade and Investment with the view that “a permanent court would permit the accumulation of precedent and lay the groundwork for North American business law.�?The intent is for this North American Union Tribunal would have supremacy over the U.S. Supreme Court on issues affecting the North American Union, to prevent U.S. power from “irritating�?and retarding the progress of uniting Canada, Mexico, and the U.S. into a new 21st century super-regional governing body.
Robert Pastor also advises the creation of a North American Parliamentary Group to make sure the U.S. Congress does not impede progress in the envisioned North American Union. He has also called for the creation of a North American Customs and Immigration Service which would have authority over U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) within the Department of Homeland Security.
Pastor’s 2001 book “Toward a North American Community�?called for the creation of a North American Union that would perfect the defects Pastor believes limit the progress of the European Union. Much of Pastor’s thinking appears aimed at limiting the power and sovereignty of the United States as we enter this new super-regional entity. Pastor has also called for the creation of a new currency which he has coined the “Amero,�?a currency that is proposed to replace the U.S. dollar, the Canadian dollar, and the Mexican peso.
If President Bush had run openly in 2004 on the proposition that a prime objective of his second term was to form the North American Union and to supplant the dollar with the “Amero,�?we doubt very much that President Bush would have carried Ohio, let alone half of the Red State majority he needed to win re-election. Pursuing any plan that would legalize the conservatively estimated 12 million illegal aliens now in the United States could well spell election disaster for the Republican Party in 2006, especially for the House of Representative where every seat is up for grabs.
|
|
First
Previous
2-3 of 3
Next
Last
|
|
Reply
| |
Quite frankly, I believe one of the most prudent political maneuvers George Bush could make (if he were able to pull it off) would be the UNION of USA, CANADA, and MEXICO. We would be the new world super power and would make the USSR look like kindergarten. Let's face it... Our economies are shot. That goes for all three countries. It would really be something to grace the Star Spangled Banner with a Maple Leaf and an Eagle conquoring Leviathan. George can't do much worse than he already has. But I suppose US citizens are not really interested in merging with the richest country in the world (It really isn't the USA because CANADA has always had the untapped resources.) and "losing" their precious autonomy in the process. Hey, I'm all for Canada giving up their so-called constitution to merge with the USA and MEXICO to form the greatest nation in the world. Well, why not? C'mon now, ya'll need to wake up and smell the coffee and realize that the home of the Bald Eagle is up here. This is where he makes his nest. The problem is, he's losing feathers fast and soon he gonna be called the great American nekkid buzzard. North America isn't exactly the only super power on the globe. (Duh-uh.) Does the USA even realize how many Canadian soldiers we have lost since 911? And it's not even "our" war!!! (Or is it?) I shake my head when I consider how so many so-called christians are all anal about the U.S. boarders and the alleged autonomy of the nation in a spirit of pathetically patriotic hypocrisy. I cannot fathom just what the USA has that Canada does not. Whatever would it be trying to hang onto? It certainly isn't their medicare system! It surely isn't their vast depleted oil resources. It isn't good old American fresh water, now is it? Is it because the Canadian Loonie has already given USA a good run for the money? What's a few pennies between friends? lol Hey, that's okay. Canada likes her position and USA has nothing she needs (except perhaps some good old fashioned "free enterprise"). Okay, okay.. I know that there are still enough Canuks up here that have their reasons for wanting to stay separate and superior to the United States of America -- especially when one considers that the entire population of Canada fits into New York with room to spare. So all you hard core nationalists can maintain your sphincter grip on your illusion of happiness for the time being. If our Canadian Sodomites were anything like USA conservatives they'd probably incarcerate me for being a traitor to my country just for suggesting that USA to join with Canada and make the rest of the planet pay attention. That's right, you can all still call yourselves Americans too. Afterall, I'm also an American. I live in North America. Doesn't that make me an American? Well it should. While we're on the subject, Mexicans are also Americans. Take a closer look at the world map next time you happen to encounter one. Canada has a WHOLE lot more worth holding onto in terms of real GNP-- now if only we could dispose of our politicians we'd have it made in the shade. Doesn't it really all come down to the oil? Well, okay... fresh water is starting to become scarce too, I understand. Well, with the polar ice caps melting away (as they have been) should we REALLY be surprised? I understand USA doesn't have much forest left to boast either. And ya'll need to do something about the quality of your beef! tsk* tsk* (It's a disgrace.) REAL CHRISTIANS know they aren't citizens of this world. They're supposed to be looking to ZION - the New Heaven and New Earth. I cannot take any of this seriously. Have we learned nothing from the Bible? Okay, go ahead and worship your flag. The rest of the world is watching you, Uncle Sam. You're getting older and weaker and you're losing teeth. I thank Jesus I don't worship my flag. NORTH AMERICA... Like it or not... We are in this together. Are God's people citizens of the world? |
|
Reply
| |
Here is some more proof of what some have been telling people about the AMERO. Notice the dates. Why is everyone suddenly so surprised all of a sudden? A: Because their ears are waxen and they don't want to listen to the messengers of GOD. Reply
| | The Plan to Replace the Dollar With the 'Amero' Jerome R. Corsi - Human Events Online || May 25, 2006 The idea to form the North American Union as a super-NAFTA knitting together Canada, the United States and Mexico into a super-regional political and economic entity was a key agreement resulting from the March 2005 meeting held at Baylor University in Waco, Tex., between President Bush, President Fox and Prime Minister Martin.
A joint statement published by the three presidents following their Baylor University summit announced the formation of an initial entity called, “The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America�?(SPP). The joint statement termed the SPP a “trilateral partnership�?that was aimed at producing a North American security plan as well as providing free market movement of people, capital, and trade across the borders between the three NAFTA partners:
We will establish a common approach to security to protect North America from external threats, prevent and respond to threats within North America, and further streamline the secure and efficient movement of legitimate, low-risk traffic across our borders.
A working agenda was established:
We will establish working parties led by our ministers and secretaries that will consult with stakeholders in our respective countries. These working parties will respond to the priorities of our people and our businesses, and will set specific, measurable, and achievable goals.
The U.S. Department of Commerce has produced a SPP website, which documents how the U.S. has implemented the SPP directive into an extensive working agenda.
Following the March 2005 meeting in Waco, Tex., the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) published in May 2005 a task force report titled “Building a North American Community.�?We have already documented that this CFR task force report calls for a plan to create by 2010 a redefinition of boundaries such that the primary immigration control will be around the three countries of the North American Union, not between the three countries. We have argued that a likely reason President Bush has not secured our border with Mexico is that the administration is pushing for the establishment of the North American Union.
Article Posted at www.KnowledgeDrivenRevolution.com
The North American Union is envisioned to create a super-regional political authority that could override the sovereignty of the United States on immigration policy and trade issues. In his June 2005 testimony to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Robert Pastor, the Director of the Center for North American Studies at American University, stated clearly the view that the North American Union would need a super-regional governance board to make sure the United States does not dominate the proposed North American Union once it is formed:
NAFTA has failed to create a partnership because North American governments have not changed the way they deal with one another. Dual bilateralism, driven by U.S. power, continue to govern and irritate. Adding a third party to bilateral disputes vastly increases the chance that rules, not power, will resolve problems.
This trilateral approach should be institutionalized in a new North American Advisory Council. Unlike the sprawling and intrusive European Commission, the Commission or Council should be lean, independent, and advisory, composed of 15 distinguished individuals, 5 from each nation. Its principal purpose should be to prepare a North American agenda for leaders to consider at biannual summits and to monitor the implementation of the resulting agreements.
Pastor was a vice chairman of the CFR task force that produced the report “Building a North American Union.�?
Pastor also proposed the creation of a Permanent Tribunal on Trade and Investment with the view that “a permanent court would permit the accumulation of precedent and lay the groundwork for North American business law.�?The intent is for this North American Union Tribunal would have supremacy over the U.S. Supreme Court on issues affecting the North American Union, to prevent U.S. power from “irritating�?and retarding the progress of uniting Canada, Mexico, and the U.S. into a new 21st century super-regional governing body.
Robert Pastor also advises the creation of a North American Parliamentary Group to make sure the U.S. Congress does not impede progress in the envisioned North American Union. He has also called for the creation of a North American Customs and Immigration Service which would have authority over U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) within the Department of Homeland Security.
Pastor’s 2001 book “Toward a North American Community�?called for the creation of a North American Union that would perfect the defects Pastor believes limit the progress of the European Union. Much of Pastor’s thinking appears aimed at limiting the power and sovereignty of the United States as we enter this new super-regional entity. Pastor has also called for the creation of a new currency which he has coined the “Amero,�?a currency that is proposed to replace the U.S. dollar, the Canadian dollar, and the Mexican peso.
If President Bush had run openly in 2004 on the proposition that a prime objective of his second term was to form the North American Union and to supplant the dollar with the “Amero,�?we doubt very much that President Bush would have carried Ohio, let alone half of the Red State majority he needed to win re-election. Pursuing any plan that would legalize the conservatively estimated 12 million illegal aliens now in the United States could well spell election disaster for the Republican Party in 2006, especially for the House of Representative where every seat is up for grabs.
| | | Reply
| | Quite frankly, I believe one of the most prudent political maneuvers George Bush could make (if he were able to pull it off) would be the UNION of USA, CANADA, and MEXICO. We would be the new world super power and would make the USSR look like kindergarten. Let's face it... Our economies are shot. That goes for all three countries. It would really be something to grace the Star Spangled Banner with a Maple Leaf and an Eagle conquoring Leviathan. George can't do much worse than he already has. But I suppose US citizens are not really interested in merging with the richest country in the world (It really isn't the USA because CANADA has always had the untapped resources.) and "losing" their precious autonomy in the process. Hey, I'm all for Canada giving up their so-called constitution to merge with the USA and MEXICO to form the greatest nation in the world. Well, why not? C'mon now, ya'll need to wake up and smell the coffee and realize that the home of the Bald Eagle is up here. This is where he makes his nest. The problem is, he's losing feathers fast and soon he gonna be called the great American nekkid buzzard. North America isn't exactly the only super power on the globe. (Duh-uh.) Does the USA even realize how many Canadian soldiers we have lost since 911? And it's not even "our" war!!! (Or is it?) I shake my head when I consider how so many so-called christians are all anal about the U.S. boarders and the alleged autonomy of the nation in a spirit of pathetically patriotic hypocrisy. I cannot fathom just what the USA has that Canada does not. Whatever would it be trying to hang onto? It certainly isn't their medicare system! It surely isn't their vast depleted oil resources. It isn't good old American fresh water, now is it? Is it because the Canadian Loonie has already given USA a good run for the money? What's a few pennies between friends? lol Hey, that's okay. Canada likes her position and USA has nothing she needs (except perhaps some good old fashioned "free enterprise"). Okay, okay.. I know that there are still enough Canuks up here that have their reasons for wanting to stay separate and superior to the United States of America -- especially when one considers that the entire population of Canada fits into New York with room to spare. So all you hard core nationalists can maintain your sphincter grip on your illusion of happiness for the time being. If our Canadian Sodomites were anything like USA conservatives they'd probably incarcerate me for being a traitor to my country just for suggesting that USA to join with Canada and make the rest of the planet pay attention. That's right, you can all still call yourselves Americans too. Afterall, I'm also an American. I live in North America. Doesn't that make me an American? Well it should. While we're on the subject, Mexicans are also Americans. Take a closer look at the world map next time you happen to encounter one. Canada has a WHOLE lot more worth holding onto in terms of real GNP-- now if only we could dispose of our politicians we'd have it made in the shade. Doesn't it really all come down to the oil? Well, okay... fresh water is starting to become scarce too, I understand. Well, with the polar ice caps melting away (as they have been) should we REALLY be surprised? I understand USA doesn't have much forest left to boast either. And ya'll need to do something about the quality of your beef! tsk* tsk* (It's a disgrace.) REAL CHRISTIANS know they aren't citizens of this world. They're supposed to be looking to ZION - the New Heaven and New Earth. I cannot take any of this seriously. Have we learned nothing from the Bible? Okay, go ahead and worship your flag. The rest of the world is watching you, Uncle Sam. You're getting older and weaker and you're losing teeth. I thank Jesus I don't worship my flag. NORTH AMERICA... Like it or not... We are in this together. Are God's people citizens of the world? | | |
|
|