rac·ism
(ra'siz'?m) Pronunciation
Key
n.
- The
belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability
and that a particular race is superior to others.
- Discrimination
or prejudice based on race.
rac'ist
adj. & n.
From
this information it should be suffice to ascertain that a racist
is a person who subscribes to this prejudicial belief
system, exercising discrimination on the basis of
race. When the State of Louisiana first
made the marriage license (government permission to marry) mandatory,
it was only mandatory for those who practiced
miscegenation, or "mixed-marriage". As long as both
individuals who married were of the "same race" they did not need to
ask the government for permission to marry. Those who were of different
racial origins were required to apply.
see: BEFORE YOU SIGN
These
people were discriminated against on the basis of
their race. "Same race" marriages required no marriage
license (or permission to marry) at that time. Later however, in 1923, Uniform
Marriage and Marriage License Act was put into effect,
requiring people to apply for a marriage license (permission to marry)
from the State government. However there were still some States in the
west that did not endorse the State government issued marriage license.
It is my understanding that by 1929, the Uniform Marriage
and Divorce Act was established, requiring all U.S.
citizens to marry by means of Civil Writ,
regardless of their alleged "racial purity".
"Racial purity" was a very serious concern for
many people of the U.S.A.
at that time and
unbeknownst to many today, Adolf Hitler's views
with respect to racial purity (and many
other views of his) were warmly received by a great majority of Statists
at that time. Swastikas were boldly
paraded in the streets alongside US flags while
crowds of US citizens cheered, prior to the second
world war. I found footage of this on the internet but it is also
historical fact.
The reason for my generous usage of quotation
marks when I use such terminology as "racial purity" and
"mixed-marriage" is because personally, I believe there is only one
human race comprising several variations of the same race. I realize
this belief is not always popular among some; but science has already
proven that all human beings are indeed the same spieces, regardless of
what the neo-nazis would tell us.
I have an improved version of the original
manuscript that you copied, here:
http://www.yourchristianspace.com/blog/view/id_12170
In the sixties people still had to learn
that there are consequences for loving corruption and confusion as much
as there are consequences for loving correctly. As for experimentation,
from a scientific standpoint, we learn that adulteration
is a process that renders a particular substance "impure". For example:
A chemist, in a laboratory setting, will regularly adulterate various
substances to learn through observation what the conclusive outcome,
product, or consequence, of that specific adulteration will
be. The "love experiments" of the sixties also produced many results
that were not conducive to the establishment of a healthy society. Many
of these experiments continue in corruption even today. Social
engineering is an ancient art. After all, someone must take the reigns
of authority to help prevent Society from falling into a state of
complete chaos. They won't do it without Jesus.
I think it stands to reason why the Lord God
told His people, "Thou shalt not commit adultery." Interestingly,
Geneticists, Biologists, and other scientists, are still doing this
today, on a daily basis, sometimes without realizing what they are
really doing: Adulterating and frequently manipulating our very own
genetic material with other material, and consequently rendering it
corrupt. Researchers are interested in what the consequences will
produce; hence, stem cell research. All the data from most of these
various medical centers available today is carefully recorded and
deciphered by researchers who record the results. Human experimentation
has not ceased by any stretch of the imagination as science continues
to work on the challenge of bio-engineering.
As for the matter of the secular government
writ, commonly called the "marriage license", few people understand
that this was also based on a genetic experiment in Louisiana shortly
after the slaves were freed. At that time many "concerned citizens"
desired to keep track of the affairs of their former slaves.
Many of the southern States in the early 1920's were
very concerned about something called miscegenation, a
bio-genetic form of what racist (race oriented)
individuals considered to be "adultery". As a result
of this great concern for inter-racial marriage they
invented a new law that required all "mixed-marriages"
to apply for a marriage license. Races of same "colour" were
not required to apply. If permission was granted to the
inter-racial couple they could 'legally marry'. Prior to this, there
was no secular marriage license in all of the U.S.A.
Neither did the churches of GOD have any such custom.
(All of this can be verified in Black's Law Dictionary.)
The custom of paying the State government
for permission to marry worked out so well for the State
of Louisiana, that other states (and nations) in AMERICA
quickly followed suit. In 1923 the Uniform
Marriage and Marriage License Act was established by
the Federal government of the United States of America. In 1929
the name of this act was changed to the Uniform
Marriage and Divorce Act. Under this act it became
mandatory for all those residents in the U.S.A. to register their
intentions to marry (if they had such intention) with a State endorsed
marriage license, regardless of race, creed, or colour; but in
the beginning it was not so. What I find most interesting
concerning the matter of licensing marriages by means
of a secular writ, is that the incidence of legal
divorcement in the U.S.A., after the establishment of this LEGAL ACT in 1923, has
increased over 600% by ratio, with respect to prior divorcement records
(which have a much earlier legal history). This should be ample proof
that rings and vows and paper writ do not a marriage make. It bears
repeating that in the beginning it was not so?
Blessings
JT
|
Free Forum Hosting
Important Announcement
Prev Message
