So it is with the sons of Belial. It is is more than evident that this man has followed that selfsame spirit that beguiled Eve in the garden. He has given himself to the total inversion and perversion of God's perfect plan in what he deems to be the interests of "equality". It is more likely that she told him what to do.
If Mike Buday were truly interested in equality then why didn't he humbly suggest to his wife that they would both be best off choosing an entirely new name? He could have changed his name legally, for a nominal fee, and she could have taken it when they married by the civil contract which essentially does the same for her and puts them both in bondage to the lying government that they will have married in a polygamous relationship with Caesar.
The interests of equality are clearly not the case here, nor are they ever the case with respect to the Jezebel spirit. Mike Buday has obeyed the law of the wifewoman in a feigned attempt at creating an illusion of equality. In truth, he has inverted the same dynamic that he claims to be so vehemently opposed to, in confusing masochism for love, and subjugating himself to that authority that he has relinquished, in the sadism of placing the responsibility of the husbandman upon his wifewoman's shoulders.
He has done a cowardly thing and is no champion of women or human rights, but is a minion of the author of confusion, carelessly casting away his birthright, discarding his namesake, and bringing a curse upon the heads of any children he might happen to mother. (I would have used the word "father" in different circumstances.)
His lawyer fully supports his decision, of course, and over time that 300 dollar fee might well run into a three thousand dollar burden �?nbsp;not to mention what a waste of tax paying dollars and time wasted in court rooms will ensue. �?'It’s the perfect marriage application for the 17th century,�?Rosenbaum said. “It belongs in the same trash can as dowries.' �?/FONT>
Mark Rosenbaum does not want the public to know that all secular government marriage applications belong in the trash can because it is these ungodly applications that contribute to his bread and butter (and if he is a plausible servant of the law of the wifewoman, to his wine and cheese supply as well). He would prefer to witness the growing prevelence of thelyphthora and the demise of western society to keep his personal coffers full before he would embrace the very thing YHWH ordained to prevent such debauchery from occuring.
If a law were ever put to the people in my country for vote on mandatory dowries and bride prices, I think I would be among the first in my community to vote YES. It would certainly weed out those "suitors" who had less than godly intentions and men like Mark Rosenbaum, who evidently love their pocketbooks considerably more than the God of their fathers and His divine law. Why does mankind think that they can make better laws regulating and governing a society than God can?
Free Forum Hosting
Important Announcement
First 
0 recommendations 
Return to THE REPROACH