"Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honor to Him: for the marriage of the Lamb is come, and HIS [ONE AND ONLY] WIFE hath made herself ready" (Rev. 19:7).
Is this really what the scripture says or has it been added to? I submit that the pink stuff has to go. We need to read the scripture as it is written. Neither is it our place to council God. Note the following non-scriptural words of a woman struggling in the throes of neo-feminism:
Isaac had only one wife. Isaac's wife, Rebekah, like her mother-in-law, Sarah, was barren. But Isaac did not take things into his own hands and have children by her handmaids, or by concubines.....like many OT men did..... Neither did Rebekah do as Sarah had done, and resort to bringing a servant girl to Isaac to produce a son for Rebekah in this manner. Instead of using human reason, taking things into his own hands, Isaac TRUSTED GOD! Men are not trusting God much these days!
What the unclean spirit is actually suggesting here in all subtilty, is that godly men should be subject to their wives just as Isaac was subject unto God through a comparison of Issac to Rebekah. There is a confusion of roles here. Instead of conceding as the Apostle Paul did with respect to marriage and the forbidding of marriage, every man having his proper gift, a perversion has manifested in a fashion that is not unlike the advocates of the "Church is the Son" doctrine.
It is sheer and utter confusion. This ungodly spirit would have a man regard his wife as his ONE AND ONLY both in body and in spirit! It begs to be worshipped and reverenced as a true saint regards his one and only God. It would even go so far as to use the example of a jealous God to justify itself in a false covering and false annointing that a woman should be so over her husband! God is not a woman that He should be so emmulated. This is vanity verging on blasphemy.